PS, It's past my bedtime. But I wanted to add this note. I don't remember if Frances Leader thinks 5G is the primary cause of sudden deaths and excess deaths or if she thinks Covid vaxes are also a cause, but, so far, I think Covid vaxes are the main cause. But I think 5G is dangerous too, but I don't have a good feel for how dangerous. I do grounding quite a bit and I take magnesium malate every day. And I don't hold cell phones next to my head or in my front pants pocket. I use the speaker phone to talk. I try to keep a few feet away from transformers etc such as in my computer cord etc. And I intend to find more info on 5G etc.
I am saying that BOTH 5G and the Vax are causing sudden deaths in the same way that they combined during the 'Spanish Flu' episode when radio was first introduced alongside a cocktail vaccine given to the US military. Thus the edges are blurred (if you like) so that it is impossible to define where one effect ends and the other begins.
5G came first. The vaccine was quickly introduced to cover up the impact. Simple stuff for oligarchs.
Okay, thanks for clarifying. Your previous claim that Chinese people were suddenly dying when 5G was installed there before the vaxes came out is interesting, but I need to see proof of that and proof that it's still happening there and/or in other locations where 5G has been installed. I think we need to have more quantified data that explains how much harm is done at what distances from 5G sources and how much likelihood there is for disability, death, and reduction of normal lifespan. Everyone is welcome to help me find such info.
Regarding the last video in my post, I tried to find something quickly that seemed somewhat scientific. As I commented above the video, it seemed like the video was ignoring the finding that pulsation worsens problems, although I only skimmed through the video a little. There may be other findings that it ignores too, like the calcium channel effects, but such viewpoints can be helpful.
Now that you mentioned the Spanish flu, the advent of radio and vaccines . . . I just remembered >> At first they called the towers *Radiation Towers* then they quietly changed it to Radio Towers. Uh-oh . . . the term "radiation" was high likely freaking out people.
ding ding ding by all means don't let the humans become suspicious. Doh.
What a coincidence that we have a very similar scenario.
2. Dr. Martin Pall. Transcript from a June 2019 interview. On page 17 Pall predicts a total societal crash in 4-6 months due to brain damage at 5G levels. Think about how people have changed in the last decade. Was Pall correct? https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cAgIsctzvtyTeNCXsOcWjirXUshmvx2X/view
I have had tremendous success using CDS at over the Protocol C daily dose in combination with a ketogenic intermittent fast diet. Only CDS water is consumed for 16-20 hours per day. For 4-6 hours per day, the CDS is stopped, and food and supplements are taken. The supplements include natural calcium channel VGCC blockers like magnesium, potassium, zinc (in a modified home made Zelenko Z stack with vitamin C kept to under a gram per day), etc. While avoiding calcium channel antagonists. Having suffered from EMF poisoning induced arrhythmias caused by keeping my cell phone in my left chest shirt pocket for decades, my heart tells me that this method allows the calcium channel blockers to be assimilated by the heart while also allowing the CDS to work its magic in keeping the bio weapons, quantum dots, self organizing nano particles, etc. under control. Here is a document showing how I make CDS. It has links to introductory information if you need that.
James Sloane always said it's important to use the right kinds of magnesium. There are bad forms of it that burn the intestinal lining, i.e. magnesium oxide and magnesium hydroxide. He always recommends magnesium malate or magnesium citrate. Looks like your CDS info came from Kalcker. That's where mine was from too.
This article discusses EMF harm, and discusses ways to protect against it. Experts who have success in treating 5G harm say shielding and avoidance are the best ways. Links are provided for further research. The comments give additional information. EMF radiation harm is not an easy or convenient topic to understand and handle. Those who put in the work should benefit from the results. Thank you.
"Covid" aka "coronavirus disease" and the imaginary virus said to cause it have never been shown to exist, hence the dangers of 5G are not similar to "covid". "Covid" is just a collection of fraudulent, meaningless test results that distract us from real health threats.
Some people keep saying viruses don't exist or haven't been proven to exist, but such people don't seem to look for evidence against their claims. I wrote a post last November called Proof of Viruses at https://covidandvaxfaqs.substack.com/p/proof-of-viruses . I pointed out that viruses could have originated from damaged genetic material, so it's obviously plausible that viruses could exist. Of course, if they can originate from normal DNA/RNA damage, they can also originate from genetic engineering. I quoted some other arguments there in support of viruses which I think are very strong arguments.
I also wrote a post last August, Is Biology Sound, at https://ilki.substack.com/p/is-microbiology-real . I showed there a lot of Dr. Harold Hillman's work explaining that a lot of microbiology is guesswork and that much of the guessing is likely wrong. He didn't suggest that viruses aren't real, that I know of, but he gave good evidence that electron microscopy is unsound, because it heats biological samples to high temperatures, which cook it, causing great distortion as well as killing it. I even included a statement from a recent M.I.T. article which said the same thing, as well as referencing a promising new tech that may overcome the problem of overheating specimens.
I heard of Hillman after listening to Dr. Tom Cowan on a video. Cowan is a virus disbeliever. I prefer to learn the truth about things, so I try to listen to all sides. I know there's evidence of a great deal of corruption in science and health, just as in politics and economics. But it's not wise to jump to conclusions about things. It's best to consider things carefully, when you have time.
My colleagues and I have searched the world for evidence of the virus, none exists.
Your articles refers to another article, saying "This message does a good job of explaining that viruses are VERY PROBABLY real and sometimes pathogenic". In other words, you have no science, just like everyone else.
You also wrote: "It's LIKELY that damaged genetic material is capable of being replicated. And such uncontrolled replication is LIKELY to be harmful. " In other words, you have no science, just like everyone else.
You also wrote: "Damaged genetic material is basically a virus." False. Viruses are said to have protein coats, and to DEFINITELY replicate and cause harm.
You then cited a video and admitted: "This ISN'T final proof that viruses are real or that they cause disease, but it’s evidence that virologists PROBABLY know what they’re doing." Lol, is this supposed to be satire?
You then cited an animal paper, where the alleged virus is already assumed to exist and the authors pretend to have a sample of it. They then administered ANESTHESIA, and then administered the fake virus-isolate via INJECTION or via an ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE. This has NOTHING to do with how "viruses" allegedly spread in nature. And after a couple of weeks they murdered these animals. This study is horrific, utterly useless, wildly unscientific and nothing more than animal abuse. And even if the authors had conducted a valid scientific study (they didn't even come close), they admitted "the numbers of animals per group in our study are insufficient to demonstrate statistically significant differences", so they knew it could not possibly provide conclusive evidence.
No kidding there are tons of "SARS-COV-2" papers published. But when one reads the METHODS they find how utterly ridiculous they are.
I don't know that you're a good judge of what are not good methods of research. The method at https://covidandvaxfaqs.substack.com/p/proof-of-viruses that the video in my post described for using a centrifuge to find plant viruses in a layer inside the centrifuge seemed entirely sensible to me. Did you consider that method ridiculous? Or were you referring to another method? If you think the centrifuge method is ridiculous, please explain why.
Re the video, you already partially showed how ridiculous it is, when you wrote:
"The following video explains that CONTENTS OF THE VIRUS CULTIVATION are put into a centrifuge..."
So-called "virus cultivation" does not require any virus to be present. What is passed off a virus cultivation is a clinical sample (containing human/bacterial/fungal materials plus whatever was breathed in, and never shown to contain a virus) being added to a cell line, typically monkey kidney cells, then fetal bovine serum is added as food for the cells except that then they reduce the amount to a fraction of what is needed to maintain the cells, hence the cells are starving/malnourished. Plus they had antibiotics/antifungals that are toxic to kidneys. They watch these starved/poisoned monkey kidney cells for several days, and if the cells breakdown in a certain way they call this "cytopathic effect" and declare that they have "Isolated the virus". Pure idiocy, and this wildly complex mixture is what is then centrifuged.
Further, simply running a centrifuge or ultracentrifugation, does not tell you what ends up in the band that they claims contains "viruses", and it does not ensure that anything has been purified, there could be many different things of the same size range. A visual check is required to see if something was even purified. And even if you have successfully purified something, that is only the beginning. Next one needs to sequence and characterize those particles and study them with controlled experiments, aka apply scientific method. Virologists are not scientists and they do not do this.
Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (211 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:
FOIs reveal that health/science institutions have no record of any “virus” having been found in a host and isolated/purified. Because virology isn’t a science:
IMO, science papers that prove Sars-CoV-2 trump FOIA requests for proof of the same. After discussing other proven viruses, anti-vaxx Dr. Suzanne Humphries (author of Dissolving Illusions) asked: What about SARS-CoV-2? Well it turns out there are a ton of papers.... See a few examples out of MANY:
There are so many papers out there where the authors state that they are doing x, y and z with SARS-CoV-2 isolates. There are an awful lot of pictures of lab results, tables, etc. etc. To me, it does not look faked.
... Another inference we could make if we take all the evidence into account is that the virus exists and can cause “illness,” but its dangerousness and lethality has been grossly, ridiculously exaggerated – to such an extent that they’ve needed to fake the footage and PCR test results to make us afraid of how bad it is. That strikes me as a perfectly reasonable inference to make.
... She also said this.
But nobody seems to answer my question, which is how come I don’t get chickenpox again? How come I only got measles once? Did I only need to detoxify once? Why don’t the same exosomes want to keep coming out of me? How come children pass the same disease to each other at parties? I treated a lot of children a couple of years ago during the measles outbreaks. Many of those parents brought their children of all different ages to be exposed to the measles and it worked for about 90% of them. Yes about 10% took more than one exposure. Does that disprove the existence of a contagion? How come a slew of babies circumcised by the same herpes laden Rabbi got herpes? What about SV 40?
Once again, no kidding that there are tons of publications. Read the methods. Find one that is actually scientific. I don't care what Humphries or anyone has said. Where is the SCIENCE?
The paper you now cite is like the earlier animal study. They used a fake SARS-COV-2 isolate, rendering the study invalid. Further, they did not expose the animals naturally. Small sample size. No control group. Clinical examinations were performed on anaesthetized macaques. Bronchoalveolar lavages were performed several times. This does not reflect what goes on in natural, is unscientific and invalid. And then they murdered some of the animals.
There is no point in me looking at more studies, unless you can first show where the alleged virus was actually found and purified from the alleged hosts. Without that, no science is possible. And the FOI responses show that no one has a sample of this imaginary virus.
Fancy, complex-looking studies with pictures, graphs etc are not proof that science was actually carried out! And none of the evidence put forward is scientific, so it doesn't matter how much of it you add up, it's all ridiculous and invalid. Humphries has surely done great work in the past in exposing dangers of quackcines, but she has dropped the ball big-time when it comes to the existence of viruses, which is very disappointing.
For example, EM images of tiny particles in a cell culture are often presented. Who cares? First of all, there is no way to know if those particles were even in the clinical sample. Secondly, maybe they came from the monkey cells or fetal bovine serum, and there is no way to rule out the possibility that they are just cellular debris from the starved/poisoned monkey tissue. And finally, without purifying them and studying them scientifically, there is zero evidence that they behave as a virus is said to. Virologists simply point and declare "VIRUS!!" Pure insanity.
PS, It's past my bedtime. But I wanted to add this note. I don't remember if Frances Leader thinks 5G is the primary cause of sudden deaths and excess deaths or if she thinks Covid vaxes are also a cause, but, so far, I think Covid vaxes are the main cause. But I think 5G is dangerous too, but I don't have a good feel for how dangerous. I do grounding quite a bit and I take magnesium malate every day. And I don't hold cell phones next to my head or in my front pants pocket. I use the speaker phone to talk. I try to keep a few feet away from transformers etc such as in my computer cord etc. And I intend to find more info on 5G etc.
I am saying that BOTH 5G and the Vax are causing sudden deaths in the same way that they combined during the 'Spanish Flu' episode when radio was first introduced alongside a cocktail vaccine given to the US military. Thus the edges are blurred (if you like) so that it is impossible to define where one effect ends and the other begins.
5G came first. The vaccine was quickly introduced to cover up the impact. Simple stuff for oligarchs.
ps
Your final video is pants.
Okay, thanks for clarifying. Your previous claim that Chinese people were suddenly dying when 5G was installed there before the vaxes came out is interesting, but I need to see proof of that and proof that it's still happening there and/or in other locations where 5G has been installed. I think we need to have more quantified data that explains how much harm is done at what distances from 5G sources and how much likelihood there is for disability, death, and reduction of normal lifespan. Everyone is welcome to help me find such info.
Regarding the last video in my post, I tried to find something quickly that seemed somewhat scientific. As I commented above the video, it seemed like the video was ignoring the finding that pulsation worsens problems, although I only skimmed through the video a little. There may be other findings that it ignores too, like the calcium channel effects, but such viewpoints can be helpful.
Now that you mentioned the Spanish flu, the advent of radio and vaccines . . . I just remembered >> At first they called the towers *Radiation Towers* then they quietly changed it to Radio Towers. Uh-oh . . . the term "radiation" was high likely freaking out people.
ding ding ding by all means don't let the humans become suspicious. Doh.
What a coincidence that we have a very similar scenario.
Indeed.
Here are some resources that might be of interest to you. I apologize if you already have this information.
1. Dr. Martin Pall - 5G Risk - The Scientific Perspective. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1chsere3Mt2ayWqRq-0yw_DNUgP8GErJF/view
2. Dr. Martin Pall. Transcript from a June 2019 interview. On page 17 Pall predicts a total societal crash in 4-6 months due to brain damage at 5G levels. Think about how people have changed in the last decade. Was Pall correct? https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cAgIsctzvtyTeNCXsOcWjirXUshmvx2X/view
I have had tremendous success using CDS at over the Protocol C daily dose in combination with a ketogenic intermittent fast diet. Only CDS water is consumed for 16-20 hours per day. For 4-6 hours per day, the CDS is stopped, and food and supplements are taken. The supplements include natural calcium channel VGCC blockers like magnesium, potassium, zinc (in a modified home made Zelenko Z stack with vitamin C kept to under a gram per day), etc. While avoiding calcium channel antagonists. Having suffered from EMF poisoning induced arrhythmias caused by keeping my cell phone in my left chest shirt pocket for decades, my heart tells me that this method allows the calcium channel blockers to be assimilated by the heart while also allowing the CDS to work its magic in keeping the bio weapons, quantum dots, self organizing nano particles, etc. under control. Here is a document showing how I make CDS. It has links to introductory information if you need that.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DcISbKY_3dfxbO0bSoNNaysx21L55ubV/view
Thanks for the links. I'll try to check them out.
I have info on CDS etc at https://covidandvaxfaqs.substack.com/p/faq-3-remedies
James Sloane always said it's important to use the right kinds of magnesium. There are bad forms of it that burn the intestinal lining, i.e. magnesium oxide and magnesium hydroxide. He always recommends magnesium malate or magnesium citrate. Looks like your CDS info came from Kalcker. That's where mine was from too.
Thank you for the advice on magnesium. Oops. I decided to try the magnesium hydroxide, but will probably go back to the magnesium citrate.
Here is some information on CDS and EDTA that you might find useful.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qHdOUklImoZj4tFA68HXmTUMtoeIt0r8/view
Universal antidote website and downloads, etc.
https://theuniversalantidote.com
Thanks again.
This article discusses EMF harm, and discusses ways to protect against it. Experts who have success in treating 5G harm say shielding and avoidance are the best ways. Links are provided for further research. The comments give additional information. EMF radiation harm is not an easy or convenient topic to understand and handle. Those who put in the work should benefit from the results. Thank you.
https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/enemy-emf-silent-weapons-for-quiet
"Covid" aka "coronavirus disease" and the imaginary virus said to cause it have never been shown to exist, hence the dangers of 5G are not similar to "covid". "Covid" is just a collection of fraudulent, meaningless test results that distract us from real health threats.
Some people keep saying viruses don't exist or haven't been proven to exist, but such people don't seem to look for evidence against their claims. I wrote a post last November called Proof of Viruses at https://covidandvaxfaqs.substack.com/p/proof-of-viruses . I pointed out that viruses could have originated from damaged genetic material, so it's obviously plausible that viruses could exist. Of course, if they can originate from normal DNA/RNA damage, they can also originate from genetic engineering. I quoted some other arguments there in support of viruses which I think are very strong arguments.
I also wrote a post last August, Is Biology Sound, at https://ilki.substack.com/p/is-microbiology-real . I showed there a lot of Dr. Harold Hillman's work explaining that a lot of microbiology is guesswork and that much of the guessing is likely wrong. He didn't suggest that viruses aren't real, that I know of, but he gave good evidence that electron microscopy is unsound, because it heats biological samples to high temperatures, which cook it, causing great distortion as well as killing it. I even included a statement from a recent M.I.T. article which said the same thing, as well as referencing a promising new tech that may overcome the problem of overheating specimens.
I heard of Hillman after listening to Dr. Tom Cowan on a video. Cowan is a virus disbeliever. I prefer to learn the truth about things, so I try to listen to all sides. I know there's evidence of a great deal of corruption in science and health, just as in politics and economics. But it's not wise to jump to conclusions about things. It's best to consider things carefully, when you have time.
My colleagues and I have searched the world for evidence of the virus, none exists.
Your articles refers to another article, saying "This message does a good job of explaining that viruses are VERY PROBABLY real and sometimes pathogenic". In other words, you have no science, just like everyone else.
You also wrote: "It's LIKELY that damaged genetic material is capable of being replicated. And such uncontrolled replication is LIKELY to be harmful. " In other words, you have no science, just like everyone else.
You also wrote: "Damaged genetic material is basically a virus." False. Viruses are said to have protein coats, and to DEFINITELY replicate and cause harm.
You then cited a video and admitted: "This ISN'T final proof that viruses are real or that they cause disease, but it’s evidence that virologists PROBABLY know what they’re doing." Lol, is this supposed to be satire?
You then cited an animal paper, where the alleged virus is already assumed to exist and the authors pretend to have a sample of it. They then administered ANESTHESIA, and then administered the fake virus-isolate via INJECTION or via an ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE. This has NOTHING to do with how "viruses" allegedly spread in nature. And after a couple of weeks they murdered these animals. This study is horrific, utterly useless, wildly unscientific and nothing more than animal abuse. And even if the authors had conducted a valid scientific study (they didn't even come close), they admitted "the numbers of animals per group in our study are insufficient to demonstrate statistically significant differences", so they knew it could not possibly provide conclusive evidence.
No kidding there are tons of "SARS-COV-2" papers published. But when one reads the METHODS they find how utterly ridiculous they are.
I don't know that you're a good judge of what are not good methods of research. The method at https://covidandvaxfaqs.substack.com/p/proof-of-viruses that the video in my post described for using a centrifuge to find plant viruses in a layer inside the centrifuge seemed entirely sensible to me. Did you consider that method ridiculous? Or were you referring to another method? If you think the centrifuge method is ridiculous, please explain why.
Re the video, you already partially showed how ridiculous it is, when you wrote:
"The following video explains that CONTENTS OF THE VIRUS CULTIVATION are put into a centrifuge..."
So-called "virus cultivation" does not require any virus to be present. What is passed off a virus cultivation is a clinical sample (containing human/bacterial/fungal materials plus whatever was breathed in, and never shown to contain a virus) being added to a cell line, typically monkey kidney cells, then fetal bovine serum is added as food for the cells except that then they reduce the amount to a fraction of what is needed to maintain the cells, hence the cells are starving/malnourished. Plus they had antibiotics/antifungals that are toxic to kidneys. They watch these starved/poisoned monkey kidney cells for several days, and if the cells breakdown in a certain way they call this "cytopathic effect" and declare that they have "Isolated the virus". Pure idiocy, and this wildly complex mixture is what is then centrifuged.
Further, simply running a centrifuge or ultracentrifugation, does not tell you what ends up in the band that they claims contains "viruses", and it does not ensure that anything has been purified, there could be many different things of the same size range. A visual check is required to see if something was even purified. And even if you have successfully purified something, that is only the beginning. Next one needs to sequence and characterize those particles and study them with controlled experiments, aka apply scientific method. Virologists are not scientists and they do not do this.
Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (211 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
FOIs reveal that health/science institutions have no record of any “virus” having been found in a host and isolated/purified. Because virology isn’t a science:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-have-no-record-of-any-virus-having-been-isolated-purified-virology-isnt-a-science/
Do virologists perform valid control experiments? Is virology a science?
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-virologists-perform-valid-control-experiments-is-virology-a-science/
“So What The Hell Is Going On”?
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/what-the-hell-is-going-on/
IMO, science papers that prove Sars-CoV-2 trump FOIA requests for proof of the same. After discussing other proven viruses, anti-vaxx Dr. Suzanne Humphries (author of Dissolving Illusions) asked: What about SARS-CoV-2? Well it turns out there are a ton of papers.... See a few examples out of MANY:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2324-7
https://www.cell.com/cell-host-microbe/pdf/S1931-3128(20)30231-6.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220302011
There are so many papers out there where the authors state that they are doing x, y and z with SARS-CoV-2 isolates. There are an awful lot of pictures of lab results, tables, etc. etc. To me, it does not look faked.
... Another inference we could make if we take all the evidence into account is that the virus exists and can cause “illness,” but its dangerousness and lethality has been grossly, ridiculously exaggerated – to such an extent that they’ve needed to fake the footage and PCR test results to make us afraid of how bad it is. That strikes me as a perfectly reasonable inference to make.
... She also said this.
But nobody seems to answer my question, which is how come I don’t get chickenpox again? How come I only got measles once? Did I only need to detoxify once? Why don’t the same exosomes want to keep coming out of me? How come children pass the same disease to each other at parties? I treated a lot of children a couple of years ago during the measles outbreaks. Many of those parents brought their children of all different ages to be exposed to the measles and it worked for about 90% of them. Yes about 10% took more than one exposure. Does that disprove the existence of a contagion? How come a slew of babies circumcised by the same herpes laden Rabbi got herpes? What about SV 40?
Do you have answers to those questions?
Once again, no kidding that there are tons of publications. Read the methods. Find one that is actually scientific. I don't care what Humphries or anyone has said. Where is the SCIENCE?
The paper you now cite is like the earlier animal study. They used a fake SARS-COV-2 isolate, rendering the study invalid. Further, they did not expose the animals naturally. Small sample size. No control group. Clinical examinations were performed on anaesthetized macaques. Bronchoalveolar lavages were performed several times. This does not reflect what goes on in natural, is unscientific and invalid. And then they murdered some of the animals.
There is no point in me looking at more studies, unless you can first show where the alleged virus was actually found and purified from the alleged hosts. Without that, no science is possible. And the FOI responses show that no one has a sample of this imaginary virus.
Fancy, complex-looking studies with pictures, graphs etc are not proof that science was actually carried out! And none of the evidence put forward is scientific, so it doesn't matter how much of it you add up, it's all ridiculous and invalid. Humphries has surely done great work in the past in exposing dangers of quackcines, but she has dropped the ball big-time when it comes to the existence of viruses, which is very disappointing.
For example, EM images of tiny particles in a cell culture are often presented. Who cares? First of all, there is no way to know if those particles were even in the clinical sample. Secondly, maybe they came from the monkey cells or fetal bovine serum, and there is no way to rule out the possibility that they are just cellular debris from the starved/poisoned monkey tissue. And finally, without purifying them and studying them scientifically, there is zero evidence that they behave as a virus is said to. Virologists simply point and declare "VIRUS!!" Pure insanity.
Where is the need for me to reply to every comment?