I’ve written quite a bit about virus theory versus terrain theory, as linked below. But Miles Mathis shows that the main terrain theory promoters are secretly connected to the vaccine companies. And you can imagine why. But I’ll present Miles’ findings below, which help make it explicit.
The following are in my free online book, COVID VIRUS & VAX FAQ's & A's.
ARE VIRUSES PATHOGENIC, E.G. RABIES?
VACCINES CONTAMINATED WITH VIRUSES
https://daily.jstor.org/european-colonization-and-epidemics-among-native-peoples/
Terrain Theory is a Psyop, by Miles Mathis
http://mileswmathis.com/terrain.pdf (First published December 10, 2023)
I am not going to spend much time on this, I just want to shoot it down with all possible efficiency. I do it now because I am tired of getting emails on it. People keep trying to snare me with this tarbaby, but as you know I have not fallen for it. I have been suspicious from the start, and although I haven't really looked into it until now, I intuited it was a project from the first words. But because I said I could understand people questioning everything after the faux-vaccine genocide in my paper on Typhoid Mary, the emails have ramped up again. I just ignore them. So all you agents can give up now. You failed again. These agents should change their names before going into these projects, since we can judge them just from that. I have been telling people from the beginning I wasn't interested in this due to one thing: the project is run by a Kaufman and a Cowan. Andrew Kaufman and Thomas Cowan. Could you be a little more obvious guys? Remember, Cowan=Cohen, so we have the usual suspects here.
… Other red flags pop up on Sally Fallon Morell, of the Weston Price Foundation, where most of this theory originates. Not only are her names a possible tip-off, the location is as well: Brandywine, MD, which just happens to be on the border of Joint Base Andrews. Sally's family is from Alexandria. Although it is named for a dentist from the 1930s, the Weston Price Foundation didn't come from him. It was founded by Morell in 1999, so it is very recent. Morell's husband Geoffrey Clendinning Morell is a psychic healer, which most would admit is another red flag.
… Andrew Kaufman is a forensic psychiatrist who previously worked as an expert witness. So already red flags popping up on him. His Terrain bio fails to mention his main work is as CEO of Zinnia Safety Systems, which makes anti-suicide devices. This company comes out of SUNY Upstate Medical College, where Kaufman worked as an assistant professor, and which gave Zinnia several grants totaling at least $75,000. Why does that matter? Well, go here (https://www.upstate.edu/news/articles/2020/2020-11-10-pfizer.php), where we find that SUNY also happens to be a spearhead for Covid vaccine research. That article from 2020 is reporting that Dr. Steven Thomas of SUNY Upstate Medical College has just been appointed by Governor Cuomo as principal investigator for the Pfizer/BioNTech global phase 3 COVID-19 vaccine trial.
… Cravat's previous film was Dirt Rich, which is about combating climate change by returning carbon to the soil. Sound familiar? It is the same thing Bill Gates is selling now, and you may have seen it ridiculed as chopping down trees and burying them to fight global warming. So we are seeing some strange bedfellows here. Even stranger: Marcelina Cravat has since apologized for her own film, which could be why it isn't available anywhere online. She now admits that global warming is a “UN brokered” false narrative and that her film needs a lot of rewriting. I wonder if she will figure out the same thing about this Terrain theory narrative?
… OK, I finally found the direct link between Terrain theory and Flat Earth. On that page for the cast of Terrain the movie, we find Jason Lindgren: Yes, I mean who wouldn't trust that guy? They brag that Lindgren has been working since 2016 with Crrow777. Wait, I recognize that handle! He is one of the top Flat Earthers on Youtube. So my intuition pays off again. This connection is not accidental. You would think they would hide their connections to Flat Earth at Terrain.com, but they don't. It is there because they want it to be found. As I say, Terrain theory is a controlled op and planned fail, meant to throw the game to the mainstream.
… Anyway, this Terrain project is incredibly clunky, and one of the first thing these Phoenician bozos do is tie their Terrain theory to Rudolph Steiner, including his claim the heart is not a pump. Big mistake, since I have already destroyed Steiner, showing he too was a Phoenician agent of the same sort. He was one of the creepiest of all time, so it is amazing he still gets any promotion. They should hide that guy in the back of the closet with Oppenheimer, Turing, Warhol, Wittgenstein and Duchamp. I have papers on all of them, if you are interested. This “heart is not a pump” thing just proves what I had intuited from the first: this Terrain theory is the Flat Earth of medicine, and I am sure these guys are being paid by Pfizer to sell it as opposition control. They would love it if you embraced Kaufman and Cowan, because in that case your opposition to Pfizer has just become meaningless.
That is why Flat Earth peaked at Youtube a few years ago and is still strong there, despite Youtube supposedly cracking down on conspiracy theory. Everything but Flat Earth and Terrain, I guess. You can tell what is a psyop just by what is allowed to stay up at Youtube and those places. Flat Earth became so heavily promoted because it was being promoted by NASA and the government. The governors don't want to debate on the facts: they would prefer to debate Flat Earthers, since they can win that one. In the same way, Pfizer and Moderna and J&J don't want to debate on the facts of the recent genocide, they want to debate these Terrain theory agents, since they can win that one. Smart, educated people will read this Terrain theory garbage and think that is the serious opposition to mainstream medical science now. Which of course sends them running back to the mainstream. You see how it works.
I know what the response to this paper will be: all these agents will simultaneously cry out that I haven't even addressed their arguments, making me “unscientific”. But that isn't what I have done. They have no arguments, since all their points are these pathetic soundbites like “the heart is not a pump” or “viruses don't exist”. Those aren't scientific arguments, they are just the most lunatic claims they could come up with at short notice, purposely chosen to drive all sane people off the subject. As with Flat Earth, I refuse to waste my time on this, since that is exactly what they want. A large part of their project is misdirection, which means any time you waste addressing this stuff is a win for them. They want you debating them endlessly, since that keeps you off real actions like starting the revolution today.
Part of it was my own fault: I admitted I was not an epidemiologist in that Typhoid Mary paper, implying one needed to be an epidemiologist to figure this out. But you don't. You don't need to debate the finer points of pathology or virology in order to figure out Terrain theory is a psyop. Once you look closely at it, like I finally did, you can tell it is a project just from its form and its players. It has all the usual earmarks, being put together very sloppily for an uneducated audience, and constructed to fall apart in the lightest wind. This is to benefit their masters, who demanded the theory be paper thin and obviously wrong—hence the inclusion of things like “the heart is not a pump”. This is so that if Pfizer ever gets in a jam or needs a quick point in a debate or lecture, it can reference Terrain theory and score a few immediate points. We have seen NASA do it with Flat Earth, trying to peg all opposition as coming from Flat Earthers, and we see it here, too, with mainstream medicine claiming all opposition comes from these medical Flat Earthers in Terrain theory, who think the heart is not a pump and who bow to Rudolph Steiner, who worshipped gnomes.
Plus, I don't need to address more specific points in Terrain theory since it has already been done. If you want extended critiques, they are up all over the internet. But I will end with one or two tidbits. These guys always focus on viruses, since the mainstream admits viruses are still mysterious. But what about bacteria? Why do they keep the focus on viruses and off bacteria? Because bacteria are better understood and have been caught causing problems millions of times. Both viruses and bacteria are “germs”, so to disprove germ theory, you would expect these guys to talk a lot about bacteria. They almost never do. This is because it was already admitted before they came along that Koch's second {criterian} couldn't be applied to viruses, because they are obligate intracellular parasites. So when Cowan or Kaufman claim Galileo status for pointing this out, as if they just discovered it, they are just blowing smoke once again. The fact that viruses can't be isolated this way is neither here nor there in this context.
Cowan claims 5G is to blame for the pandemic, which is obvious misdirection. There was no pandemic, it being just a renamed flu. The whole thing was totally manufactured to sell vaccines, as we now know. There may have been some new strains released to boost flu season in 2020 a bit, but by and large the whole thing was manufactured to create fear. Plus, Cowan's arguments are contradictory: was the 1918 Spanish flu also caused by 5G? 5G is bad, but we don't need it to explain anything here.
For those who haven't already delved deeply into Terrain theory, I will give you a quick immersion. You might wonder what Terrain theory has to say about smallpox, smallpox being the uncontested number one success story of germ theory and vaccines. Well, a Bing search on that leads us to this first listing that directly addresses that question. It is by Dawn Lester at WhatReallyMakesYouIll.com. The article is short and has no discernible content that I could find. Lester says she is going to prove to us that smallpox isn't what killed Native Americans, but you get to the end of her article without being presented even one tiny bit of evidence in that direction. She suggests they were murdered, committed suicide, or died in gold mines. Unfortunately she includes a picture of a Native child with smallpox. So those pox were caused by gold mines?
She also suggests the deaths were caused by unsanitary conditions or lack of sewers. But wait, if there are no germs, what is the problem with sewage? Sanitation was invented to avoid germs, so denying germs but talking about sanitary conditions is lunacy. She also suggests the Natives weren't bathing enough, which is insane for the same reasons. She might as well claim they weren't washing their hands with antibacterial soap often enough. For her assertion to begin to make any sense, she would have to show the Natives were dirtier after the colonists arrived, and that this “dirt” somehow degraded their terrain, but not by carrying germs that did it. Terrain theorists generally argue that rolling in the dirt is GOOD for children, so I see a big contradiction here. I agree that rolling in the dirt is generally a good thing for animals and children, but that is because it strengthens the immune system, which is a germ theory explanation. The kids get introduced to pathogens and develop antigens. White blood cells fight off the undesirable bacteria and viruses.
If that is true, why have sanitation at all? Obviously because you can overdo it on the dirty environment. Rolling around in dirt is one thing. Rolling around in sewage or your own feces is another thing. There is a limit to what the immune system can handle. And even a ripping immune system like many Natives probably had couldn't deal with pathogens it had never encountered. It makes perfect sense that stirring large populations together that had never met would cause major problems like this. But only if germ theory is true. Without germ theory, Natives would have nothing to fear from sick colonists.
This is also strange: it isn't only Youtube that is promoting this “fringe” theory in high gear, it is also Google, Bing, and the other search engines. I was astonished to find that it is far easier to find support for Terrain theory than criticism. The opposite of what you would expect. For instance, I typed in “contagion myth debunked” at Bing, but Bing doesn't want to show me that. Instead, Bing is very insistent that I be taken to sites that sell it, and those sites were top-listed. Same thing for other similar searches like “terrain theory negative reviews”. Clearly, if you are questioning anything right now, this is where you are being herded by the mainstream. That is enough to prove this is a psyop by itself.
Although Terrain theory is supposed to be a fringe theory, somehow it managed to get huge promotion not only from the big search engines, but from all the usual big alternative sites. How does that work? Terrain theory is promoted from literally thousands of websites, the same websites that won't touch my stuff. I wonder why that is? Actually I don't wonder because I know why: I am real and they are fake. They are promoted from Langley and I am anti-promoted from the Air Force on down.
… This psyop is nefarious for another reason: many reading this paper will think I am defending mainstream medicine here, which is of course the opposite of my intent. As usual, this Terrain psyop creates a dialectic where the truth is on neither side. Some have said both germ theory and Terrain theory are right, since germ theory admits the health of the host is very important. The terrain after all is the IMMUNE SYSTEM. A stronger host will have a stronger immune system, which may be able to fight off any germ with little sign or symptom. [Which is of course what made the Covid “science” so perverse: it is based on vaccines, which were invented to confer immunity by calling up a response from the host's immune system. But in this current fiasco, we were told immune responses were inadequate or inferior: we needed this new faux-vaccine, which they sold almost as some sort of antibiotic or magic bullet, capable of wiping out a disease on its own. A vaccine that was better than an immune response. Totally illogical, since a vaccine calls up an immune response. Or used to, when vaccines were actually immunizations instead of deadly gene therapies.] But instead of being politic and claiming both are right, I think it would be more accurate to say both are wrong. Terrain theory is wrong because it was created to be wrong. It is the manufactured false opposition. But germ theory, though roughly correct, has been captured by the capitalists and corrupted to sell fake vaccines. Because germ theory is very young, being only about 150 years old in its current form, we would expect it to be incomplete. But this fledging status isn't its current greatest problem. The problem is that medicine, like everything else, has been infiltrated and monetized out of all recognition of its original form. So arguing about history or science is actually misdirection here. This isn't a matter of history or science, it is a matter or economics or ethics. We now know that Pfizer bought out a majority of the world, including most American institutions: the medical profession, the universities, the government, and the media. In doing that they ignored all standing science in all fields, just making it up to suit themselves. As in art, everything previously known was thrown out the window and the field was reinvented overnight by salesmen and promoters. So arguing about germ theory is bootless. None of this mRNA stuff is even based on germ theory. It is based on making you sick and killing you via jacking with your genes. Which is exactly why they have framed the argument as if it is about germ theory. They want you out in the bushes arguing about germ theory, because that keeps you off far larger questions, such as why we have drug companies running the country and buying out regulatory agencies and governors and Presidents and courts and all the TV channels and the internet. And such as why we are messing with our genes to start with. And such as whether we should just call the US a fascist country, since the media is now a government front, censoring widely and wildly under direct orders from the Feds.
… As you will remember, all these “mandates”—which have zero legal standing—didn't come out legislatures, either federal or state. So they weren't laws. They were just pronouncements or bluffs from governors or health departments, which again had no legal standing for making such pronouncements, much less for enforcing them with any kind of police. Which is why many sheriff's departments—and a few police departments—refused to enforce these mandates. Many more police departments silently declined to enforce, without making any statements to that effect. Businesses also had no authority to enforce vaccine or mask mandates, and in the matter of masks were actually breaking standing OSHA laws on masking of employees. As for requiring masking of customers, that was a white area, but no standing laws gave them that authority. They hid behind illegal “emergency measures”, but even those emergency measures were limited to 30 days—which they dragged out for two or three years.
It is things like that that people like Cowan and Kaufman are trying to keep you away from. They have dredged up Antoine Bechamp from 150 years ago and Rudolph Steiner from 100 years ago because they want you arguing about Terrain theory instead of remembering your own government just bilked trillions from you while murdering your family members with an illegal drug marketed illegally, and forced down your throat by a captured Congress and media. They want to move you on from the biggest theft and mass murder in the history of the world, a murder in which large parts of the country were complicit, including your doctor, your pharmacist, your governor, your mayor, your health department, your insurance company, your President, your Supreme Court, all your TV channels, your congresses, your favorite movie stars, your favorite sports stars, and many of your neighbors and friends/acquaintances.
… {T}he mandate never applied to Congress in the first place. . . so they didn't need an exemption from Biden. They were exempt to start with. Hah. Talk about pettifogging. The bottom line is that while investing in vaccines and taking huge donations from Big Pharma, Congress didn't have to get vaccinated, and many of them didn't. The CEO of Pfizer Bourla admitted on camera that he and his family weren't vaccinated. Whoops! He claimed it was because he wanted to let more needy people get theirs first. Yeah, right.
It was an interesting article that split the followers.
P.S. I note you don't post on milesmathisfreeforums anymore, which is understandable, but it would be good to have a place to discuss Miles' work properly. I thought your input was insightful. Are you in contact with him.
not for me, not buying the bs. unsubcribing.