9 Comments

You are amazing for covering the key elements needed to prosecute. Virologists like Baric have free will and it's ridiculous that criminal charges have been waged against those who speak out versus those like Rick Bright, Daszak, Fauci Alex Azar, other attorneys plus 100s of politicians with their bankers boys.

Expand full comment

A very picky point, re: "This program, designed to commercially weaponize <<<as in to make lethal to humans> a naturally occurring toxin <<<i.e. a coronavirus>,..." Were these ppl to be hauled into court, would their crimes be mitigated in any way IF they got Drs. Stefan Lanka, Tom Cowan, or Andy Kaufman to take the stand and show that there's no proof that the "naturally occurring toxin" is nothing but completely non-toxic and non-infectious exosomes? In other words, would they be able to use that as a defense?

Expand full comment

I might be okay with such a defense, since it would mean vaxes are useless, but I wouldn't accept that vax ingredients are harmless.

Expand full comment

I'm not suggesting the vaxes are harmless (though in fact most of those actually injected into ppl might have been, since the vast majority of the adverse events reported to VAERS came from something like 5% of the vax lot numbers, as was pointed out a little over a year ago, though I wonder whether those numbers are still like that, or whether some adverse events just took a longer time to kick in; but I digress). I'm guessing (and this IS mostly my guess) that the vax is definitely a bioweapon or an array of diverse bioweapons, though many of the actual injections happened to be harmless saline, for the purpose of deliberately confusing the public (since I daresay we ALL personally know ppl who got the vax who seem perfectly OK). But Lanka, Cowan, Kaufman (etc.) show that virology itself is basically fraud, because nobody yet has actually isolated an infectious "virus" from anyone who was sick w/ that "virus", and then grown that "virus" in a petri dish and then infected another healthy person w/ that "virus" so that they got sick w/ what the first person had (a loose description of Koch's Postulates). And since Lanka proved, to the satisfaction of the German Supreme Court, that measles doesn't exist, we really ought to join him in wondering what, precisely, is in a so-called "measles" vaccine. My point is whether this crooks could successfully defend themselves by saying, "coronavirus isn't a toxin, and nobody can prove that it is," and use that to undermine the law they're being charged w/ breaking.

Expand full comment

I'm pretty sure I and my siblings had measles as kids, before measles vaxes were created. And the measles were definitely going around via contagion. I have an earlier post on viruses. So far, the strongest evidence for me is that viruses are real, but vaxes are fraudulent.

Expand full comment

Well, Dr. Cowan disagrees on several points about measles.

Expand full comment

In my post about viruses at https://covidandvaxfaqs.substack.com/p/proof-of-viruses I said:

[Here's what] anti-vaxx Dr. Suzanne Humphries (author of Dissolving Illusions fame) recently wrote about the theory that viruses don’t exist:

... “But nobody seems to answer my question, which is how come I don’t get chickenpox again? How come I only got measles once? Did I only need to detoxify once? Why don’t the same exosomes want to keep coming out of me? How come children pass the same disease to each other at parties? I treated a lot of children a couple of years ago during the measles outbreaks. Many of those parents brought their children of all different ages to be exposed to the measles and it worked for about 90% of them. Yes about 10% took more than one exposure. Does that disprove the existence of a contagion? How come a slew of babies circumcised by the same herpes laden Rabbi got herpes? What about SV 40?

... Many papers have been written about how they took isolates of [the first SARS coronavirus] and infected animals with it. For example this paper from 2004: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC521815/

-- You can find many more papers like it for that virus and many others. Seems like a compelling case for the idea that viruses exist and cause effects commonly labeled as disease or illness.

-- There are also many papers where the authors describe how they “reverse engineered” the original SARS and many other viruses. They call it reverse genetics. Meaning they create a replica/clone of the virus from RNA fragments based on the viral genetic sequencing that has been done. See for example here: https://www.pnas.org/content/100/22/12995"

You can read the rest of the post at the first link.

Expand full comment

Look, this is all off the topic of your substack article; but all your questions are answered in Cowan & Morell's THE CONTAGION MYTH, which I decline to regurgitate here.

Expand full comment