Since some challenge the claim that graphene doesn't exist etc, I did a search on Stefano Scoglio at https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=stefano%20scoglio&kind=video&sort=new to see if Scoglio has made other claims. I found that videos involving him on Bitchute say SPIKE PROTEIN is a Fairy Tale, or Myth, the Variant is pure Invention and older ones say Viruses don't exist.
I previously read yesterday a post by Scoglio saying graphene doesn't exist and that one seems reasonable, as he says what's called graphene is actually graphite, what's called lead in lead pencils etc. I hadn't heard the claim before that spike protein is a myth, but I've heard and read quite a bit about viruses not existing. If viruses didn't exist, then virus parts, such as spike proteins, wouldn't exist either. But I wrote this in reply last November, https://covidandvaxfaqs.substack.com/p/proof-of-viruses, showing that viruses surely do exist, although they're not normally as dangerous as generally claimed.
And yet, in this interview last year, Stefano Scoglio twice refers to the graphene hypothesis. Firstly to express caution (I paraphrase): "because its not a subject on which he's spent much time and because the mRNA and PEG as toxins proven to be contained in the jabs is a more compelling fact". Secondly that recently he's found himself to be almost convinced by the graphene narrative:
Since some challenge the claim that graphene doesn't exist etc, I did a search on Stefano Scoglio at https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=stefano%20scoglio&kind=video&sort=new to see if Scoglio has made other claims. I found that videos involving him on Bitchute say SPIKE PROTEIN is a Fairy Tale, or Myth, the Variant is pure Invention and older ones say Viruses don't exist.
I previously read yesterday a post by Scoglio saying graphene doesn't exist and that one seems reasonable, as he says what's called graphene is actually graphite, what's called lead in lead pencils etc. I hadn't heard the claim before that spike protein is a myth, but I've heard and read quite a bit about viruses not existing. If viruses didn't exist, then virus parts, such as spike proteins, wouldn't exist either. But I wrote this in reply last November, https://covidandvaxfaqs.substack.com/p/proof-of-viruses, showing that viruses surely do exist, although they're not normally as dangerous as generally claimed.
https://truthcomestolight.substack.com/p/april-11-2023-la-quinta-columna-the?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email read all the transcripts and check out the photos. Powerful and passionate.
And yet, in this interview last year, Stefano Scoglio twice refers to the graphene hypothesis. Firstly to express caution (I paraphrase): "because its not a subject on which he's spent much time and because the mRNA and PEG as toxins proven to be contained in the jabs is a more compelling fact". Secondly that recently he's found himself to be almost convinced by the graphene narrative:
https://m.soundcloud.com/mette-mitchell-910151233/interview-with-nobel-nominee-stefano-scoglio-about-virus-the-current-situation-and-homeopathy