NO GRAPHENE IN VAXES, NO SHEDDING

No Nanotech in Vaxes

(Support RFK Jr 4 Pres. here & Ban Mandates!)

REALITY VS. FEAR TACTIC

This may be a lesser-known Reality: Targeting the Human Microbiome at sashalatypova.substack.com/p/design-of-a-weapon-modifying-the

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Next is surely a Fear Tactic (shedding, nanotech, etc). Last week I came across a substack post that referenced online video evidence supposedly of graphene in blood samples of unvaccinated persons whose family members had been vaccinated with Pfizer Covid vaxes. But later I found that the claims in the post were retracted after a discussion with someone in the Comments section at https://dailynewsfromaolf.substack.com/p/breaking-confidential-pfizer-documents/comments. Following is that discussion.

----------

COMMENTS THAT COVID VAXES DO NOT CONTAIN GRAPHENE

{Roger Apr 6}

Graphene is a major scientific fraud. Don't fall for this.

{Author}

Are you saying there is no graphene oxide in these injections? Can you please provide the info you are relying on for this{?}

----------

{Roger}

About this video: https://rumble.com/v2dqkyu-lennesima-figura-di-palta-dei-grafenisti.html

Here is my translation of some of the slides and commentary presented by Stefano Scoglio, published on March 18th. Bear in mind I don't know a lot of Italian.

The first four minutes are about a personal dispute between Scoglio and a man named Marcianò. No interest. Scoglio says graphene does not exist. Marcianò says it exists because a document (from 2020) by "Pfizer" says so.

Time mark: 04:17

Scoglio explains that this document is about the recombinant spike protein (the artificial BNT162b2 RNA sequence) and says nothing about the vaccines (as a final product) or the hypothetical graphene or graphene oxide. It is limited to show how the spike glycoprotein is a possible antigen for potential use in the production of vaccines. In the next slide, Scoglio explains that the document mentions that "P2 S was further purified by size-exclusion chromatography." That's the purification of the lab protein. Nothing to do with ill people or vaccinated people.

In the next slide (06:00) we have documents that are responses to FOI requests from the US CDC about the purification of "spike protein" from ill people (the natural or the vaccine spike, not the lab spike of the 2020 document from Pfizer) which say that they have no record about the isolation and purification of spike protein from people. In essence, the artificial spike protein has never been found in a human body. Plot twist!

Where is the confusion? In the next slide, Scoglio argues that the graphene oxide mentioned in the 2020 Pfizer document comes from the method used to purify the lab spike protein. This graphene here has nothing to do with being a contaminant or an ingredient present in the final product "vaccine mRNA." This mention of graphene oxide is limited only to the purposes of the cited document from Pfizer. In order to use a microscopy technique (Cryo-EM, electron microscopy) to analyze the structure of the synthetic lab spike (not the natural one!) they used gold "Quantifoil 300" mesh grids, which happen to be lined with graphene oxide (which is merely graphite, but that is {explained in} another video from November or December.). This method of analysis has nothing to do with the contents of the vials of the Pfizer vaccine.

{At} 08:15, in this slide Scoglio explains that the document cannot be used to support the claim that there is graphene in the vaccines. According to Scoglio, this is a fear-based manipulation, by people not in power ... who want to take power. Then there are some sarcastic comments in response to his rival.

In the final slide, Scoglio repeats that graphene is a fraud, a hoax. It's only graphite. And he recommends his article which proves that graphene is a fraud: https://www.poliphylia.com/il-grafene-non-esiste/

{Roger}

Hi {Author}. I've watched a few of your interviews and podcasts, we agree 99%. The Exposé is publishing these days a lot of articles about this topic. In the article published by The Exposé on March 31st the{y} cite an internal document from "Pfizer" titled: "PF-07302048: Structural and Biophysical Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein (P2 S) as a Vaccine Antigen", "VR-VTR-10741, Ver. 2.0". This document has nothing to do with the production of the vials. It is about the recombinant Spike protein, a study about how the computer made mRNA produces, in the lab, the spike protein on cells.

But the point of the document where graphene is found "3.4 Cryo-EM of P2 S" simply explains the method for the preparation of a sample to take an electron-microscopy picture. The graphene oxide is used simply to coat mesh grids where the sample of the purified protein will be placed, to take the picture. Nothing to do with what goes in the vials.

If there are other documents which specifically explain that graphene is used in the production of the LNP+mRNA or other component that finally goes in the vials I don't know, but this internal document is not the one that says that. I know this thanks to Stefano Scoglio. Unfortunately, Scoglio publishes videos in Italian. I will post here a translation I made of some of this content later: https://rumble.com/v2dqkyu-lennesima-figura-di-palta-dei-grafenisti.html.

Scoglio has had a few debates with the proponents of Graphene. I'll give you more info on that tomorrow. I think this is just another misdirection. Who runs The Exposé? I don't follow that website.

----------

{Author}

I don't know who writes The Expose but they have done good work in the past. I threw you out a hat tip in my retraction statement for bringing this to my attention. Thanks!

OK. I have reviewed the comments on the article and others are pointing out the same criticism. I am going to issue a retraction on this article. What do you think about the researchers who are reporting finding graphene in the vials (Even if Pfizer and others aren't admitting to the ingredient in documents.)

{Roger}

Personally, I don't have confidence in them, but I'm biased. I think it's very likely they are plants in the MFM {Medical Freedom Movement}. I know this issue is quite controversial; lots of people want this to be true, because of the 5g theory.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sorry, I forgot to add a Subscribe button.