Col𝗹𝗮𝗯orative, deliberative and collusive leak illustrates raqueteering or RICO Act violations alongside several constitutional felonies outlines by Dr. David Martin such as 18 U.S §175 Bioweapon Distribution or Transfer.
Essentially they bought their approval? Not surprised. Congress people - so many - had money tied up in this "project." It's why we need to STOP Insider Trading with Congress and their associates/family and to REPEAL THE PREP ACT!
My question on this is WHERE/HOW would any pharmacist be able to HANDLE any of these if their temperature had to be -130 and -76? That proves that they really put c-rap into people and not whatever they had "manufactured." Bogus and deadly
Is this the going rate for two fast track patent applications? Or for official abandonment of two patents? How does that work? They received the approval, and, when the SHTF, they covered their tracks by abandoning their patents?
I admit I'm not super versed in its use yet would take any form of justice. David Martin outlines 8 U.S. § section codes that our Constituional patriots could push on these criminals and seems to champion RICO as well. While he is somewhat polarizing, he is definitely informed inside and outside the courtroom having been contracted by governments to look for bioweapon violations since the early 2000 Anthrax days, which might have been the distraction or false flag you are thinking about.
As far as the RICO Act, it's been used on white collar cartel organized crime including financial institutions. In fact I read (maybe you can verify) it's been employed over 1000 times successfully between 1970 - 1990. In thsame article, which was Britanica based from a source & CaseLaw perspective:
In Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co. (1985), the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that RICO is not limited to organized crime but may be applied to legitimate commercial-enterprise businesses. The Belgian company Sedima filed an action against rival Imrex in a U.S. district court in 1982, alleging that Imrex inflated its purchase prices and costs by preparing fraudulent purchase orders and credit memos. The action was originally dismissed by the lower court on the grounds that no RICO injury occurred, and the court’s decision was upheld on appeal.
Note to viewers: I've added updates at the end of the above post.
Col𝗹𝗮𝗯orative, deliberative and collusive leak illustrates raqueteering or RICO Act violations alongside several constitutional felonies outlines by Dr. David Martin such as 18 U.S §175 Bioweapon Distribution or Transfer.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/175
Pay to play. That $2.8 million was probably the cost of a priority review.
Essentially they bought their approval? Not surprised. Congress people - so many - had money tied up in this "project." It's why we need to STOP Insider Trading with Congress and their associates/family and to REPEAL THE PREP ACT!
My question on this is WHERE/HOW would any pharmacist be able to HANDLE any of these if their temperature had to be -130 and -76? That proves that they really put c-rap into people and not whatever they had "manufactured." Bogus and deadly
This is standard Pfharma bribery to obtain NDA (New Drug Approval). Pay to play, you know!
Nr Kinder is amazing for the coverage gathering the info, here is the collective feature: https://weaponizednews.com/world-news/us-world-covid-patents-implicate-pandemic-conspiracy/
Is this the going rate for two fast track patent applications? Or for official abandonment of two patents? How does that work? They received the approval, and, when the SHTF, they covered their tracks by abandoning their patents?
I admit I'm not super versed in its use yet would take any form of justice. David Martin outlines 8 U.S. § section codes that our Constituional patriots could push on these criminals and seems to champion RICO as well. While he is somewhat polarizing, he is definitely informed inside and outside the courtroom having been contracted by governments to look for bioweapon violations since the early 2000 Anthrax days, which might have been the distraction or false flag you are thinking about.
As far as the RICO Act, it's been used on white collar cartel organized crime including financial institutions. In fact I read (maybe you can verify) it's been employed over 1000 times successfully between 1970 - 1990. In thsame article, which was Britanica based from a source & CaseLaw perspective:
In Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co. (1985), the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that RICO is not limited to organized crime but may be applied to legitimate commercial-enterprise businesses. The Belgian company Sedima filed an action against rival Imrex in a U.S. district court in 1982, alleging that Imrex inflated its purchase prices and costs by preparing fraudulent purchase orders and credit memos. The action was originally dismissed by the lower court on the grounds that no RICO injury occurred, and the court’s decision was upheld on appeal.