Thanks Len for your TIME and EFFORT to do this 'AI BIASED' analysis;) It's interesting to read it, although I do not think good stuff about AI at all. It is only as good as the programmers, paid BY BIG MONEY, which then always should lead to questions about the 'bias'..
The main issue with this analysis is the inability of AI to read actually... WHY? Despite of me constantly talking about covid19 GENE THERAPIES via the injections, which are FALSELY called 'vaccines', that entire analysis is doing just that, using MY SUMMARIES while calling that what I'm writing about 'vaccines', which I do not!... I do NOT LIKE IT, that's a LIE. That is the reason why I'd just avoid AI's and use own BRAIN instead ;)
EDTA. In your message you said you disagree with Dr. Love about EDTA being dangerous. Do you disagree with these claimed side effects? "EDTA, or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, is a chelating agent used to bind and remove heavy metals from the body. While it has medical applications, it also comes with risks. Some of the dangers include:
- Kidney damage: EDTA can strain the kidneys, potentially leading to kidney failure.
- Electrolyte imbalances: It can lower levels of essential minerals like calcium, magnesium, and potassium, which may cause irregular heartbeats and other complications.
- Blood pressure issues: EDTA can lead to dangerously low blood pressure.
- Anemia and clotting problems: Some forms of EDTA have been linked to anemia and blood clot formation.
- Gastrointestinal distress: Side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea have been reported.
- Drug interactions: EDTA can interfere with medications such as insulin and warfarin, potentially leading to severe health issues."
Aren't there much safer detox remedies like chlorella and phytic acid in grains etc, which don't remove good minerals?
AI. AI is biased, but the biases can usually be overcome. A lot of Youtube videos have transcripts now, but there are usually time stamps on each line of transcript. I tried using my OpenOffice text editor on it, but it's a laborious process. I then submitted text to AI and told it to remove the time stamps. AI was able to do it very quickly. For important matters, it's important to check the AI results for errors or bias. You can actually use one AI to check another. I mostly use Perplexity.ai and Copilot.com. For removing time stamps, Copilot is more reliable. Perplexity is less accurate and more biased, but Copilot can't handle as much data at a time. Sometimes AI says it can't mess with transcripts because of copyright. But if I say it's not copyrighted, it goes ahead and follows directions.
VAXES. Do you believe there are good vaccines? Since you dislike referring to mRNA shots as vaccines, it seems like you must believe that regular vaccines are good. But I've read for a long time, esp. by Neil Z. Miller, that vaccines have never been proven to be safe or effective, and that vaccines suppress the immune system and possibly that they cause auto-immune conditions. So, since I already regard vaccines as bad, it doesn't bother me if the mainstream refers to mRNA shots as vaccines. It's more convenient to call them vaccines or at least vaxes. I'm an anti-vaxer and I oppose mRNA shots too. Would I have to say I'm an anti-injector, or an anti-injectionist, or an anti-shotter? What about insulin shots and stuff like that?
Thanks Len for your TIME and EFFORT to do this 'AI BIASED' analysis;) It's interesting to read it, although I do not think good stuff about AI at all. It is only as good as the programmers, paid BY BIG MONEY, which then always should lead to questions about the 'bias'..
The main issue with this analysis is the inability of AI to read actually... WHY? Despite of me constantly talking about covid19 GENE THERAPIES via the injections, which are FALSELY called 'vaccines', that entire analysis is doing just that, using MY SUMMARIES while calling that what I'm writing about 'vaccines', which I do not!... I do NOT LIKE IT, that's a LIE. That is the reason why I'd just avoid AI's and use own BRAIN instead ;)
EDTA. In your message you said you disagree with Dr. Love about EDTA being dangerous. Do you disagree with these claimed side effects? "EDTA, or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, is a chelating agent used to bind and remove heavy metals from the body. While it has medical applications, it also comes with risks. Some of the dangers include:
- Kidney damage: EDTA can strain the kidneys, potentially leading to kidney failure.
- Electrolyte imbalances: It can lower levels of essential minerals like calcium, magnesium, and potassium, which may cause irregular heartbeats and other complications.
- Blood pressure issues: EDTA can lead to dangerously low blood pressure.
- Anemia and clotting problems: Some forms of EDTA have been linked to anemia and blood clot formation.
- Gastrointestinal distress: Side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea have been reported.
- Drug interactions: EDTA can interfere with medications such as insulin and warfarin, potentially leading to severe health issues."
Aren't there much safer detox remedies like chlorella and phytic acid in grains etc, which don't remove good minerals?
AI. AI is biased, but the biases can usually be overcome. A lot of Youtube videos have transcripts now, but there are usually time stamps on each line of transcript. I tried using my OpenOffice text editor on it, but it's a laborious process. I then submitted text to AI and told it to remove the time stamps. AI was able to do it very quickly. For important matters, it's important to check the AI results for errors or bias. You can actually use one AI to check another. I mostly use Perplexity.ai and Copilot.com. For removing time stamps, Copilot is more reliable. Perplexity is less accurate and more biased, but Copilot can't handle as much data at a time. Sometimes AI says it can't mess with transcripts because of copyright. But if I say it's not copyrighted, it goes ahead and follows directions.
VAXES. Do you believe there are good vaccines? Since you dislike referring to mRNA shots as vaccines, it seems like you must believe that regular vaccines are good. But I've read for a long time, esp. by Neil Z. Miller, that vaccines have never been proven to be safe or effective, and that vaccines suppress the immune system and possibly that they cause auto-immune conditions. So, since I already regard vaccines as bad, it doesn't bother me if the mainstream refers to mRNA shots as vaccines. It's more convenient to call them vaccines or at least vaxes. I'm an anti-vaxer and I oppose mRNA shots too. Would I have to say I'm an anti-injector, or an anti-injectionist, or an anti-shotter? What about insulin shots and stuff like that?