Thank you for compiling these sources. I believe I have read all the articles listed, but not listened to every interview. I appreciate people who research all sides of issues. Before it was scrubbed from Harvard’s site, Charles M. Lieber’s research history was readily available. I thought the titles of the articles and grants lent credence to the self-assembling circuitry assertions. I also found Dr. Nixon’s experiments fairly compelling. One issue I have with the scientists and doctors asked about this issue is that there is no overlap in the Venn diagrams of their positions. One group says what you see is crystals of salts, the other says these are not salts because salts do not light up and send put arms. One says mRNA and contaminants are causing the deaths and disabilities. The other says there is no mRNA in the shots at all. I want to see the two groups together with the same microscopes, same samples, same spectrometers, etc., and see where the truth lies. I would not doubt that both entities are present in certain vials.
Yes, I read early on that the vax batches that were national were deadly, but the batches that were local were much less harmful. Apparently, they thought it would be too hard for anyone to make the connections to deaths on the national level. But, thanks to batch numbers connected to VAERS reports, I think, someone was able to figure it out. So it appears that they did vary the ingredients. I read that they're close to being able to target individuals. I see that Ana has a post on Charles Lieber at https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/the-expose-flashback-charles-liebers. I haven't looked at many of her posts yet myself. Here's an article saying Lieber was found guilty of having some connection to Chinese, but he's requesting a new trial or dismiss the conviction: https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2022/2/9/Lieber-moves-for-retrial/.
Thank you for compiling these sources. I believe I have read all the articles listed, but not listened to every interview. I appreciate people who research all sides of issues. Before it was scrubbed from Harvard’s site, Charles M. Lieber’s research history was readily available. I thought the titles of the articles and grants lent credence to the self-assembling circuitry assertions. I also found Dr. Nixon’s experiments fairly compelling. One issue I have with the scientists and doctors asked about this issue is that there is no overlap in the Venn diagrams of their positions. One group says what you see is crystals of salts, the other says these are not salts because salts do not light up and send put arms. One says mRNA and contaminants are causing the deaths and disabilities. The other says there is no mRNA in the shots at all. I want to see the two groups together with the same microscopes, same samples, same spectrometers, etc., and see where the truth lies. I would not doubt that both entities are present in certain vials.
Yes, I read early on that the vax batches that were national were deadly, but the batches that were local were much less harmful. Apparently, they thought it would be too hard for anyone to make the connections to deaths on the national level. But, thanks to batch numbers connected to VAERS reports, I think, someone was able to figure it out. So it appears that they did vary the ingredients. I read that they're close to being able to target individuals. I see that Ana has a post on Charles Lieber at https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/the-expose-flashback-charles-liebers. I haven't looked at many of her posts yet myself. Here's an article saying Lieber was found guilty of having some connection to Chinese, but he's requesting a new trial or dismiss the conviction: https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2022/2/9/Lieber-moves-for-retrial/.