INCONVENIENT VAX STUDY
Documentary: Vaxed Kids Over Twice as Sick
CONTENTS — FIND IN PAGE
DEL BIGTREE, MEDICAL JOURNALIST — VAXXED DOCUMENTARY — PARENTS’ VAX STORIES — COLTON’S PARALYSIS — INFORMED CONSENT
1986 GOV’T TRAITORS — SUE THE GOV’T — TRIPLETS DISASTER — TESTING — TRIALS
WEASEL SCIENCE VAX TRIALS — HASTY TRIALS
DTP VAX STUDY SHOCKING — CDC DRAGGED FEET — FINDING THE SCIENTIST — FLORIDA & MISSISSIPPI
DR. THOMAS FINDING — AFRAID TO PUBLISH — FAUCI’S PREVIOUS ATTACK — IT’S A STRONG STUDY
HOW MUCH MORE DISEASES VACCINATED KIDS HAVE — TAKEAWAYS — OPPORTUNITY
FAMILIES IN HELL — MORAL OBLIGATION — FORD LEGAL THREAT — PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE — WHERE’S THE SCIENCE?
I learned of this Study from CHD. Then I found the recent Documentary. I’m quoting much of it below. See HOW MUCH MORE DISEASES VACCINATED KIDS HAVE.
INTRO
Authors of ‘Astonishing’ Study Showing Unvaccinated Kids Are Healthier Refused to Go Public With Results
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/unvaccinated-kids-healthier-henry-ford-health-study-aaron-siri-ican-senate-hearing/
During a U.S. Senate hearing today on how the corruption of science has affected public opinion and vaccine policy, attorney Aaron Siri revealed a long-hidden study on vaccinated versus unvaccinated children, and testified about the origins of the study and why its findings were suppressed. {See the above link.}
by Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D. September 9, 2025
The leaked unpublished scientific paper “Impact of Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Outcomes in Children: Birth Cohort Study,” co-authored by Dr. Marcus Zervos, was cited in Senate hearing records and media covering the controversy:
According to testimony (by Aaron Siri), the study’s conclusions were withheld from publication due to institutional pressure since “findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe.” “The only real problem with this study, and why it didn’t get submitted for publication, is that its findings did not fit the belief and the policy that vaccines are safe... This is a real world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted... Everything else gets shoved in a drawer.”
Abstract: Summarizes the objective to compare short- and long-term health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated children within a Michigan healthcare system.
Study Design: Describes a birth cohort study using data from 18,468 children born between 2000 and 2016.
Setting: Conducted within an integrated healthcare system in Michigan.
Participants: Children enrolled in the system from birth, with vaccination status tracked.
Exposure Definition: Categorizes children based on exposure to one or more vaccines versus none.
Health Outcomes Measured: Includes chronic conditions such as asthma, allergies, developmental delays, and gastrointestinal disorders.
Statistical Methods: Details regression models and adjustments for confounding variables.
Results Summary: Presents comparative rates of chronic conditions between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups.
DEL BIGTREE, MEDICAL JOURNALIST
Documentary - An Inconvenient Study https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKsxUOg4IJE
We are now the sickest country in the world. The health of American children is in crisis. A huge rise in chronic conditions in kids 17 and under. More than 40% of American children now have at least one chronic health condition. Autoimmune disease like rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile diabetes, lupus, Crohn’s disease, all this IBS, eczema, asthma, all out allergies, stomach issues, ADHD, Tourette syndrome, sleep disorders, autism. This is the one that gets me. Just a few decades ago, one in 10,000 children had autism. Today, it’s 1 in 31. But there’s no way in the world that these kinds of rapid increases in the incidence of disease could be genetic. Genetic change takes generations or centuries to play out. What’s really causing our kids of this generation to be so chronically sick? What the heck is happening? America is the sickest nation in the industrialized world. It is now believed that over 54% of our kids have a chronic disease, either a neurological disorder or an autoimmune disease. That’s up from only 12.8% back in the 1980s. In roughly 40 years, we have seen the greatest decline in human health ever recorded. {That’s probably not counting the Black Death.}
What if I told you there is a study that could shed light on this chronic disease epidemic, but no major medical institution seemed willing to do it? What if I told you there was one scientist brave enough to conduct this study? What if I told you that when the study was finished, that scientist was too afraid to publish it? What would you do? Maybe you would do what I did. I got hidden cameras and recording equipment and I went to ask him why. {Dr. Zervos said:} “I don’t want to say it’s not the right thing to do. It’s the right thing to do, but I just don’t want {to do} it, publishing something like that. Might as well retire. I’d be finished.” Zervos is probably going to lose his job over this.
VAXXED DOCUMENTARY. Why don’t we just take it all the way back to how this actually started. I’ve been a medical journalist for almost 20 years now. My first 10 years was at CBS and the last eight years or so I’ve had my internet news show called The Highwire. But the biggest change in my career happened when I produced a documentary about vaccinations called “Vaxxed”. And at the center of that documentary was a whistleblower from the CDC named Dr. William Thompson. He came forward in 2015 and said that they were committing scientific fraud on the vaccine safety studies. Well, that film blew up and became a worldwide sensation, mostly because we got so much bad press, starting with being kicked out of the Tribeca Film Festival. The decision to run a controversial documentary about vaccines has Robert Deniro at the center of a big screen backlash. There was a backlash which I haven’t fully explored. I want to know the truth and I’m not antivaccine. I want safe vaccines. “Vaxxed” producer Dell Bigtree says cancelling the screening {at the festival} amounts to a suppression of the truth. I can’t imagine what type of pressure came down that would make them pull a movie that they were obviously behind in the beginning. The message from the medical community is clear.
PARENTS’ VAX STORIES. “Vaxxed” ended up being one of the most controversial documentaries in history. And because of that, there were lines down the block everywhere we went. In fact, the very first day we screened at Angelica Film Center in New York, I wanted to know why there’s this giant line down the block. What are these people here for? {Del asked his audience:} “Can every parent or someone you know if you have a family member with autism, would you please stand up right now? I’d like to see.” Three quarters of the room stood up. I had no idea that there was this many people suffering from this issue. I ended up asking that question three screenings a day, 5 days a week for an entire year. And every single time, 3/4 of the room stood up. I realized I had stumbled on something absolutely massive. After the screenings, parents of injured children were inspired to tell their own stories. We set up video cameras and started interviewing everybody that wanted to talk. And what I discovered is it wasn’t just autism and it wasn’t just the MMR vaccine. There was an ocean of vaccine injury and nobody {else} was talking about it. {Parents described all sorts of horrible vax injuries to their kids, even deaths.}
COLTON’S PARALYSIS. Clearly, this was a bigger issue than anybody realized. But there was one particular interview that we did that really changed my perspective forever. Colton was a 13-year-old healthy, strong boy. {His Mom said:} He loved anything that has to do with an adrenaline rush. Motocross was his passion. The doctor says, “Hey, he’s the age that you should get the HPV vaccine.” I said, “Okay.” So, he was administered the vaccine. And then this is the last day he got to ride that big boy bike. And that day he came home, he was starting to feel nauseous, with a really sore neck. He still didn’t want to get out of bed. I just thought, “Man, you’re just really weak and exhausted.” And that evening when he sat up to take a drink of water, he just flopped back and his head just hit the pillow and I went, “Colton, are you going paralyzed?” They immediately took him down to Primary Children’s Hospital in Salt Lake. Original diagnosis was transverse myelitis. When the doctor came out and asked me, “Has he been sick?” I said, “No, he hasn’t been sick.” He had the HPV vaccine on February 1st. and they went, “Oh, well, we’ll be reporting that to VAERS.” {Colton said:} It does suck like not being able to play sports any more. Now I have to sit on the sideline, just watch everybody. You got to do your research. Like, you can’t just trust a doctor anymore. Do your own ways to find out what’s best for you. Unfortunately, Colton ended up taking his own life in 2018 because he believed he’d become too much of a burden on his family. But the thing I remember about standing there and watching that interview taking place -- my co-producer, Polly Tommy, was doing the interview -- was this box that was hanging on his side that was breathing for him. And it went through a tube that was going through a hole in his throat and he literally had to wait for it to fill his lungs with air before he could answer a question. So it would fill and then he would start answering the question until he ran out of air. I thought about all of the people that accused these so-called antivaxxers of bringing back polio or the iron lung. {They would say:} Once vaccination rates fall, you’re going to have a lot of people getting sick and a lot of children paralyzed for the rest of their life with polio. I thought, he’s wearing an iron lung. He’s not laying in a metal tube anymore. They’ve reduced it down to a box that hangs on your side and a hose that goes to your throat. But in this case, he wasn’t paralyzed because he had polio. He wasn’t paralyzed because he didn’t vaccinate. He was paralyzed by the Gardicil HPV vaccine. Then I went home and started looking up all of the inserts, the warning labels that are wrapped around all the childhood vaccines and most of them say it right there: serious adverse events. Gonet syndrome, that’s paralysis, or transverse myelitis: paralysis. And I realized we didn’t eradicate paralytic diseases with the vaccine program. We’re causing paralytic diseases with our vaccine program.
INFORMED CONSENT. So, as we travel the country, some parents would come up and say, “I’m about to have a baby. I’m definitely not going to get the MMR vaccine cuz your movie shows that that one’s dangerous. But what about the other 16 vaccines that are given in 72 doses by the time my child’s 18?” And I’d say I only have anecdotal evidence from the thousands of interviews I’ve done that not a single childhood vaccine is safe. But that’s not scientific. I wanted something better. I wanted to get to the bottom of this. So I started a nonprofit called the Informed Consent Action Network based on the Nuremberg code’s right to voluntary consent of the German Air Force, the ethical principle globally agreed upon in the wake of the Nazi doctors’ horrifying human experiments of inmates in concentration camps for experimental purposes, where it states the voluntary consent to the human subject is absolutely essential and there should be no element to force fraud, deceit, duress, or overreaching, or other ulterior forms of constraint or coercion.
1986 GOV’T TRAITORS
What I wanted to do was investigate the entire vaccine program. I was really focused on one thing. We hear that vaccines are safe and effective. But before we even worry about if they’re effective, how did we determine they’re safe? We started looking at all the science around the world. But we hit a big roadblock. You can’t sue a manufacturer of a vaccine. It’s one of the only products in America that has what they call liability protection. The reason is because of a law that was passed in 1986 by the US government. The pharmaceutical industry basically blackmailed the government and they said we are losing so much money from lawsuits for death and injury from our vaccines. We can’t make a profit. Studies have shown that the whooping cough or pertussis vaccine causes brain damage. The controversy isn’t really over the fact that it happens, but how often it happens. And they said if you want us to continue making vaccines, you’re going to have to take on the liability. And our government agreed to that.
SUE THE GOV’T. If you want to sue or you want to get any information outside of what’s publicly known, you’re going to have to sue the government. And that’s when I realized I need a constitutional attorney. And I found a guy named Aaron Siri. Mr. Siri, you’re not a medical doctor, are you? No, sir. And you’re not an immunologist or biologist or any kind of or vaccinologist? No, but I depose them regularly, including the world’s leading ones with regards to vaccines. And I have to make my claims based on actual evidence. When I go to court with regards to vaccines, I don’t get to rely on titles. Okay? He had a genius way forward. We’re going to sue the government agencies, HHS, FDA, NIH, and we started winning. And what did we prove in those lawsuits? That the entire science behind vaccine safety was nothing but a complete fraud.
TRIPLETS DISASTER. Doctors used to listen to parents. When their parents came in and said, “Hey, my kid is suffering with this condition, has this issue.” Doctors listened to them. But when parents started coming in and saying, “My kid went in and got a vaccine and then started having X issue,” that’s when doctors stopped listening. Hi, how you doing? We have triplets, two boys and a girl, Richie, Robbie, and Claire. Every day in our life was a party. Every single day they were smiling and laughing and looking at each other, engaging in each other. On June 25th, 2007, we brought him in for the pneumococcal shot. My daughter still has the mark on her leg from the shot. She was the first one to get it, and she screamed and never really stopped screaming after that. But we continued. We didn’t know. We did the boys as well. By noon, Claire shut completely off. It was as if she was blind and deaf. And all she did at that moment was stare at the ceiling fan. So that was at noon. We had the shot at 10:00 a.m. We watched Richie shut off. They lost all their reflexes. They stop blinking, stop yawning, stop coughing, stop sneezing. The worst is when we saw the final one shut down. We were told it was genetic and then we were told by geneticists that there’s no possible way three children would shut off on the same day. So we had severe autism spectrum disorder for all three kids entering kindergarten. We have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to recover them. The only person that we got back is Robbie, the one that was last to shut off. Richie can only say single, maybe two words together. Claire is still completely nonverbal, not potty trained, and Robbie is approaching grade level, but severe OCD. This one story of Richie, Robbie, and Claire puts an end to any discussion that autism is only caused by genetics. There is no genetic explanation that would turn three siblings off on the exact same day.
TESTING. What you should do when there are widespread complaints that a product is causing a given harm is you should study it. Vaccines should be tested like other medicines. They should be safety tested. And unfortunately, vaccines are not safety tested. Of the 72 vaccine doses now essentially mandated, none of them, not one, has ever been subject to a pre-licensing placebo-control trial. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. has been torn apart by mainstream media for saying that there’s no placebo trials being done for vaccines. But he’s right. It’s exactly what we found in our lawsuits against the government. Not a single childhood vaccine is going through a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. That’s the gold standard of safety testing for all pharmaceutical products, but is being skipped for vaccines.
TRIALS. In case you forgot how a double-blind place-based trial works, as we discussed it back in high school science class, let me remind you, we break up a group of kids into two groups. One group is going to get the vaccine. The other group is going to get a placebo which is a product that has no effect on the human body. When it comes to an injectable like vaccines, that is a saline injection. Then it’s called double blinded because both the scientists and the patients are blinded from knowing which one they got. Did they get the vaccine or did they get the placebo? This is so that the scientists will not manipulate the study in favor of the pharmaceutical industry that will stand to make a lot of money, if this vaccine proves to be safe. Then we track these two groups for two to five years -- it’s sometimes as long as 10 years for a lot of drugs. -- And at the end of that study, we unblind both the patient and the scientist. So we look at both groups, the vaccinated and the placebo group. And we compare their health outcomes. Who had more cancer? Who had more diabetes, or ADD/ADHD, or autism, or Tourette’s, or lupus, or multiple sclerosis, all of these things that are currently skyrocketing in the United States of America? And if when you compare them, they both turn out the same, there’s the same amount of issues in the vaccinated group as is in the placebo group, then you know it’s safe. We establish what we call a safety baseline. But if the vaccinated group has more issues than the placebo group, then we know it’s not safe and it shouldn’t be put on the market. Only one problem. Not a single vaccine on the childhood schedule has ever been through a double-blind place-based trial. Therefore, they cannot say the vaccines are safe, based on science.
WEASEL SCIENCE VAX TRIALS
Are all vaccine trials placebo controlled? No. Some say we can’t always do placebo trials, especially if there’s already a vaccine that covers a disease. An example is Prevnar 13. Prevnar 13 in its safety trial was tested against Prevnar 7, the earlier version of the vaccine. They say you cannot test Prevnar 13 against a saline placebo because it would be unethical. You’d be denying children access to a vaccine that is already on the market and that’s not fair to them. But what he leaves out is that Prevnar 7 was never tested against a saline placebo. So we don’t know if it’s safe. So we’re testing one product we don’t know is safe against another product we don’t know is safe. And this is how the entire vaccine schedule works. I like to call this the whiskey study, where there’s a group of people that are complaining that whiskey is making people drunk and they’re crashing their cars and people are getting killed. In order to test, does whiskey cause car accidents, you would set up a double-blind placebo trial. One group, the test group, would get 10 shots of whiskey. The other group, the placebo group, would get 10 shots of water. And then we’d have them both drive on a driving course and see who has more accidents. It’s obvious, but in this case, the whiskey company is the one doing the study. And what they say is, our placebo-based trial is not going to be with water. It’ll be with vodka, another product already on the market. And so, 10 people get the whiskey shots and 10 people get the vodka shots. And they had them all drive. And guess what? They had just as many car accidents. Therefore, whiskey does not cause car accidents because it didn’t cause any more than the vodka did.
HASTY TRIALS. No vaccine placebo study was ever done. All you have to do is type in FDA licensed vaccines on your computer and every vaccine that they give your child on the childhood schedule will appear there and then you can click on any one you’re interested in. Let’s click on Recombivax HB. This is one of the hepatitis B vaccines they give your baby on the first day of life. Hello, welcome to the world. Gasp for your first breath and here comes your first sexually transmitted disease. Now go to vaccine insert. This is the insert or the warning label that is wrapped around the vaccine when it’s delivered to your doctor. It has all kinds of information like what’s in the vaccine, all the ingredients, side effects of the vaccine. But I want you to focus on section 6.1. This is where they talk about the clinical trial they relied upon to establish safety. It’s always 6.1 on every single vaccine, so you can look at all of them. But in this one, you’ll see that there was only 147 children in the entire trial. And they were only monitored for 5 days after each dose. 5 days. So think about it. Would you take any drug that was only monitored for safety for 5 days? If your child dies on day six, it wasn’t captured by this trial. They’ll say, “We didn’t see any deaths.” If a child had autism 2 years later or other autoimmune diseases or neurological disorders, things that take years to develop, they’ll say, “We didn’t see any in our trial.” This is why every drug we take goes through a multi-year safety trial. Most of your issues are going to take years to develop. And if your study isn’t that long, you’ll never ever see them.
DTP VAX STUDY SHOCKING
So, let’s be clear. Vaccine safety is not based on science and data. It’s based on an assumption of safety. And that is the stalemate we find ourselves in. But there’s one way out of it. Instead of doing a placebo-based study, you can do a retrospective study, looking at people that have already made their choice whether they’re going to vaccinate or not. And then you just compare those groups, the ones that got the vaccines and the ones that decided not to vaccinate. We call that the vaccinated versus unvaccinated study. It’s been done by a few independent scientists and institutes amongst small groups of children but never by a major government agency or a major medical facility. The reason this study is important I think is illustrated by a study that was done in Guinea Bissau Africa by a man named Dr. Peter Abbe. He’s one of the lead experts. He’s pro-vaccine and he develops vaccine programs for the third world. He had a DTP vaccine program he’d run 30 years ago in Guinea Bissau, Africa and recognized 30 years later, you know what? Only half the children in the country got that vaccine and the other half didn’t. He could do a perfect comparative study between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. And when he did that study {”Routine vaccinations and child survival: follow up study in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa” published in 2000}, the results blew his mind. This is about vaccines. And I think it’s important to recognize that no routine vaccine was tested for overall effect on mortality in randomized trials before being introduced. I guess most of you think that we know what our vaccines are doing. We don’t. Well, you had 2.3 times higher mortality if you were DTP vaccinated and that is the most commonly used vaccine in the world. So the whooping cough vaccine or pertussis vaccine was associated with twofold higher mortality. You can have a vaccine which is fully protective against a specific disease, but associated with higher mortality. How is that possible? After looking at this study, it was clear that the vaccine did protect against the diseases they were vaccinated for. The kids didn’t die of diptheria, tetanus, and pertussis. Only one problem. Once they looked at it, they were dying at five times the rate of all of these other issues. So, it was clear that they were protecting against these diseases, they were weakening their immune systems to all sorts of other problems. One of the other scientists on this study did a TED talk on this. In spite of being protected against three deadly diseases, the introduction of DTP was associated with increased overall mortality. Children who received DTP vaccine had five times higher risk of dying than those who didn’t. And this is just one example of many studies now done of DTP vaccine. And they all show the same. DTP vaccinated children have higher mortality than those who didn’t get DTP vaccine.
CDC DRAGGED FEET. That was just a study of one vaccine in a group of children. What if you studied children that were receiving not one vaccine, but between 72 and 100 vaccines by the time they’re 18? Of course, I’m talking about the most vaccinated nation in the world, the United States of America. Our federal health authorities actually paid the Institute of Medicine to look at the safety of the vaccine schedule as a whole. And the Institute of Medicine after conducting that review came back with a report in 2013. The report said no studies have compared the differences in health outcomes between entirely unimmunized populations of children and fully immunized children. It’s the CDC’s responsibility to do those studies and they’ve been ordered again and again and again to do them and they have refused. But the Institute of Medicine has looked at the vaccine schedule and said in their 2011 report there are over 150 injuries that are likely to be associated with vaccines that have never been studied. Well, what did the CDC do after the Institute of Medicine issued that report? Instead of doing the study, they ended up doing a study on how to do a vax versus unvaxed study. It paid a whole lot of money to issue a white paper on how to conduct that study comparing vaccinated versus unvaccinated kids. That white paper came out in 2015. Now, here we are in 2025, 10 years later. They’ve still never published that study. Why have they never done the study? I can’t tell you. This is information that vaccine safety advocates want and have been asking for for a long time and I’m not sure why it hasn’t been done. This simple study would shut up every antivaxer forever. I have to believe that they have considered this study every way they possibly can and they can’t figure out how to make it look like the vaccinated are healthier. But that’s just my opinion. Based on several other studies I’ve seen that did compare vaccinated to unvaccinated, but mainstream medicine says, “Well, the cohort was too small.” Or they poke holes in it saying it wasn’t done by a major medical institution. So, if we’re ever going to get a vaxxed versus unvaccinated study that people believe in, it’s going to have to be done by highly accredited scientists at a major medical institution who has a database big enough to do a thorough robust investigation comparing the vaccinated to the unvaccinated. {Why doesn’t RFK Jr force CDC to do the damn study?}
FINDING THE SCIENTIST. As fate would have it, Del met the head of Infectious Disease at Henry Ford Health System, Marcus Zervos. The first time I met with Dr. Zervos, he agreed to do a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study. I was ecstatic. He was perfect. Ford Medical Center is one of the greatest research centers in the world and Dr. Zervos is in the middle of being a hero for having just worked out the entire Flint, Michigan water crisis. Flint, one of the poorest cities in America, had bought its water from Detroit. Instead of staying on the Detroit water supply while the pipeline was being built, the city would temporarily get its water from the Flint River. That decision would force the city to activate an old water treatment plant. The water soon became a breeding ground for Legionella and people were getting sick. There had been 90 confirmed cases in the year and a half following the water switch. 12 people had died. Dr. Zervos seemed perfect. He’d stood up against the entire health system in Michigan. So I figured he’d probably be brave enough to do this study. But then a couple of years went by and still no study. I called Aron and said, “Why don’t we go see if we can’t convince him to finally do this study?” I flew down to Michigan and we went to meet Dr. Zervos in person. We said, “Look, here’s your opportunity. The results should be directly in line with the orthodoxy. The vaccinated kids should be healthy across the board. He could be hailed a hero for finally shutting up the antivaxers.” He said he’s willing to do it. The study was going to use the data they literally already have at their fingertips, the data of millions of people who are already in the Henry Ford Health System database, including hundreds, maybe thousands of completely unvaccinated children, as well as obviously children who are vaccinated. What that would allow is taking that multi-million person database, segregating out the children who had been in the Henry Ford system from birth continuously for a few years because it’s a captive HMO environment, meaning it provides the insurance and provides the medical care. It has most of the health records for these kids, including if they go out of the Henry Ford medical system, Henry Ford as the insurer was still paying for it. So they have the health codes for all the medical services that these kids got. It appeared to me that Henry Ford was provaccine not antivaccine. So I had to assume the only reason they would do this study was to prove us wrong. Del and I thought that was an excellent opportunity. They can do the comparison and presumably they could get it published. We only had one request, “whatever the outcome, you publish it”. Would he stick to that if the results show that unvaccinated kids are healthier and when he realized that if he submitted that for publication, he’s going to face the wrath of his entire profession?
FLORIDA & MISSISSIPPI. The Florida Department of Health in partnership with the governor is going to be working to end all vaccine mandates in Florida law. All of them. All of them. My experience with discussing or disclosing harms associated with the vaccines is that those are not welcome ideas or conversations. That move from the Florida Surgeon General is drawing condemnation from public health experts. He’s not going to necessarily receive a warm embrace by some of the people in his profession, but that’s really what courage is all about. It’s a very hostile environment both scientifically and in the media for individuals who reach conclusions or have opinions that counter mainstream ideas. Every independent scientist that has ever ventured into doing a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study of any kind is immediately under assault. There’s one by Dr. Anthony Mosson out of Mississippi. He did a homeschool study of about 600 kids and discovered alarming rates of allergies, ADD, ADHD, neurological disorders, and a four-fold increased risk of autism amongst the vaccinated. As soon as the study came out, his job was under threat. In fact, I asked him if he’d be in this film, and he said, “Look, you can show my studies, but I have just been dragged through the coals on this. I can’t take any more.”
DR. THOMAS FINDING
Then there’s Dr. Paul Thomas: I’ve been a pediatrician for 35 years. I’m now retired. What I noticed in the first decade or so of my practice is kids were getting sicker and sicker. And over the next decade, as more and more patients chose not to vaccinate, I got to see the difference. But I wanted to see, could I prove it? So, we got all the data from my practice. We looked at every baby born into my practice and published it in an international journal of public health. What we found, and that study was peer- reviewed, was massive increases up to 500% more allergies, autoimmune conditions, neuro-developmental issues, and then we had infections of all kinds. Massively increased in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. What happened when I published that study? Within days of it being available online, I get a call from my attorney. Don’t go see any patients. Don’t write any prescriptions. Don’t go into the office. Your license has been suspended.
AFRAID TO PUBLISH. So what if Dr. Zervos does this study and it turns out exactly the same way as the others? Would he still publish it? That was the question. Years went by. In 2020, I was informed they had put together a study. When I had that study in my hand and I looked at it, the significance of it, it was an actual study that when published was the first step in changing this landscape. Weeks went by and then more time went by and at some point what I learned was it was not going to get submitted for publication. Aron called me and said, “They finished the study. Only one problem. They’re not going to publish it.” I mean, it was everything we were afraid of. I called Dr. Zervos and I said, “Can I fly out and meet you for dinner?” And he agreed. I decided to bring hidden cameras and recording equipment so that no matter what happens at this dinner, I can prove it happened. {In Michigan, it is generally legal for a person to record a conversation they are a part of without the consent of the other parties. This is because Michigan is considered a “one-party consent” state for recording conversations.}
FAUCI’S PREVIOUS ATTACK. I was sitting at that dinner reading the study for the first time and thinking, “Oh my god, the world needs to see this study.” But the more I pressed Dr. Zervos to publish it, the more excuses he had. I think it’s a good study, but it has it does have limitations to it. The argument against it is going to be that it’s retrospective. It’s not a controlled group. There’s other factors involved. It’s a heterogeneous group of conditions. The perfect example was hydroxychloricquine. Did I happen to mention that not only was Dr. Zervos at the center of the Flint, Michigan water crisis. He was also at the center of the Hydroxychloroquine study that was done by Ford and showed a 50% reduction in death for those that received Hydroxychloroquine. And for that, he got attacked by Tony Fauci and virtually everybody in mainstream media. The Henry Ford Hospital study that was published was a non-controlled retrospective cohort study.
IT’S A STRONG STUDY. How about looking at this as important scientific information that can inform how the proper study should be done? It won’t be taken like that, because there’s a political agenda to it. It has its issues. Any retrospective study is always going to have the same problems. There are limitations to retrospective studies. That’s the reason why we like to do randomized clinical trials when we can, because they don’t have the same limitations. The major one that you have to worry about with retrospective studies is things that are different between the groups that you’re comparing that you’re unable to account for. If someone were critical of the study, I think issues that a researcher might raise would be things like the different lengths of follow-up for the groups between the children who received no vaccines and the children who received vaccines. The authors actually did do a sensitivity analysis where they limited the analysis to children who had at least a certain amount of follow-up. When they limited the follow-up time for both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated to one year, it’s still 2.75 times higher rate of chronic disease in the vaccinated. And when they limit it to 3 years, it’s 3.38 times the rate of chronic disease in the vaccinated. And when they limit it to 5 years, it’s four times greater. So no matter what they did to limit the follow-up time, the results of the study didn’t change the trend. The results indicate that the different follow-up period really did not have a substantial effect on the research question that they were probing. They limited the population of children who didn’t receive any vaccines to children who at least had some number of medical visits. And even in that sensitivity analysis, the main findings persisted. In this study, they adjusted for confounders. Confounders can be age, socioeconomic status, gender, racial, ethnic groups, and used a technique called Cox proportional hazards, which means holding all other factors equal. What’s the relationship between the factor of interest and the outcome? Even after they were adjusted for, the effect of these characteristics was actually pretty small. I actually expected that those adjustments would have a really powerful effect, but they actually didn’t. And when you do a lot of sensitivity analysis and what you’re seeing doesn’t change much, that can be reassuring. The authors did a good job with the information that they had. I have seen studies on vaccines published in good journals that are much weaker in quality. Is what your study shows important? Yeah, it is important.
THE CRUX
ORDER OF WORST VAX EFFECTS
The following is based on the above data from the video, showing the number of kids with each condition and how many times more suffer than the unvaxed do of each disease. The first 4 numbers aren’t shown in the above data. The one for seizures is from AI. 1.00 means a disease has the same rate in both groups, vaxed and unvaxed. I’ll comment below this list.
HOW MUCH MORE DISEASES VACCINATED KIDS HAVE
NUMBER; TIMES MORE; DISEASES
? = 2.54 x Chronic Health Conditions
? = 5.96 x Autoimmune Disease
? = 4.29 x Asthma
? = 3.03 x Atopic Disease
1029 = 5.53 x Neurodevelopmental Disorder
577 = 1.4 x Food Allergy
463 = 4.47 x Speech Disorder
420? = 1.70? x Seizure Disorder
341 = 1.63 x Mental Health Disorder
262 = 3.50? x ADHD
219 = 3.28 x Developmental Delay
169 = .9 x Cancer
165 = 3.00? x Behavioral Disability
150 = 2.92 x Motor Disability
127 = .83 x Neurological Disorder
o65 = 8.00? x Learning Disability
o46 = 1.10? x Tics
o42 = 1.00? x Diabetes
o23 = .62 x Autism
oo9 = 1.00? x Other Psychological Disability
oo8 = 1.00? x Brain Dysfunction
oo5 = 1.00? x Intellectual Disability
TAKEAWAYS. Autoimmune Disease and Asthma appear to have a vax cause, but Food Allergy not much if at all. Neurodevelopmental Disorder, Speech Disorder, maybe Seizure Disorder, Mental Health Disorder, ADHD, Developmental Delay & maybe Behavioral Disability & Motor Disability are suggested to have a vax cause. Cancer, Neurological Disorder, Learning Disability, Tics, Diabetes, Autism, Other Psychological Disability, Brain Dysfunction & Intellectual Disability are suggested not to have a significant vax cause. This study apparently didn’t include Covid vaxes, since it covered 2000-2016. Those so-called mRNA vaxes appear to be even much worse than the real vaxes.
OPPORTUNITY. I put my whole career on the line, because I saw an issue that is affecting the children of America and the world. We have a serious growing problem of autoimmune disease, chronic illness. I am not saying that vaccines are the only cause, but I am saying this program needs some serious work. We had much better health. With 54 shots, with 72 doses, it is clear we are not making our children healthier. They’re going the wrong direction. I’ve never said I’m trying to eradicate vaccines from the planet, but we are at an autism rate now of what 1 in 28? We have some serious issues. No, I actually agree with that. Is there a different way we could be doing it? If I can’t get this study out, then what hope is there for every kid in the future? Unless there’s a change in leadership, nothing’s going to happen. I just want to say this. This is the Galileo moment. I believe this changes more lives than anything there is. If we can fix this vaccine program, it doesn’t just change millions of children’s lives here in America. It changes worldwide.
FAMILIES IN HELL
In the scientific literature and for the advancement of science, we must have balance. There are always pros and cons to everything. And when we have a deep-seated religious bias in favor of vaccines, we’ve lost balance. And when we lose balance, the entire scientific enterprise goes off-track. And when that happens, large populations are harmed. I cannot help but ask myself the question, how many children will suffer a chronic illness that they maybe wouldn’t have to suffer had this information been out there? {Dr. McCullough said:} I treat a lot of kids with neuro-developmental disability and neuro-psychiatric illness and their lives and their family’s lives are hell. And I know so many parents who suffer all kinds of guilt -- the parents who’ve had adverse reactions or who’ve witnessed neuro-developmental regression in connection with vaccination, they are devastated. I’ve had so many mothers say to me, “My child is like this because of me -- I did this to them.” I think we are absolutely destroying our future by destroying the overall health of our most precious asset, our children. We need to know if this is true. We are morally and ethically obligated to replicate this study again and again and again and find out if this is accurate and if this is true.
MORAL OBLIGATION. I challenge you doctors and researchers, do the research. Find within your data set, within your system, those who are unvaccinated and compare them to the vaccinated cohort. This is one data set. You could replicate this again. There are other captive payer systems. Let Kaiser Permanente Southern California do it and let the Harvard Pilgrim System in Boston do it and all the other health systems around the country and maybe even the CDC with the VSSD. And with that we can start actually addressing the problem that these vaccines might be causing. If these results are valid, this is an absolute sea change in our understanding of the off-target and non-specific effects of vaccination and we will have to reconsider the way we go about our vaccination program.
FORD LEGAL THREAT. This is a cease and desist letter we received from the attorneys for Henry Ford Health. This letter leads me to believe that they really don’t want us to release this film. In the letter, Henry Ford accuses us of defamation for saying that the unpublished study wasn’t submitted for publication due to the results of the study. They assert that the reason the study was never submitted for publication was quote due to significant and serious flaws in its data and methodology and because it did not come close to meeting the rigorous scientific standards Henry Ford Health and its researchers demand. But we just heard from Dr. Marcus Zervos, the lead author on this unpublished study and a world-leading expert on infectious disease at Henry Ford. He told me he believed the study was a good study and he would publish it just as it is. Only one problem. If he does publish it, he believes it would be the end of his career. He’d be finished. Not my words, but his.
PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE. Now, even if Dr. Zervos stands by his study, does that mean it’s a perfect study? Of course not. Can we say that the Henry Ford study proves that vaccines are causing the chronic disease epidemic? No, we cannot. A retrospective study does not prove causation. What we can say is that we believe it is showing a signal, a red flag waved in the air by the scientific method. Houston, there may be a real problem here. Now, this concern is heightened by the fact that this unpublished study does not stand alone. It’s not an anomaly. It now stands with several other studies that have all shown similar signals. So there will certainly be attacks on the limitations of this study which can be found in most retrospective studies and we acknowledge those limitations. But the only way to really refute it is to do your own vaccinated versus unvaccinated study and prove us wrong. That’s what I believe Dr. Zervos attempted to do and failed.
WHERE’S THE SCIENCE? But as parents watching this film right now, you have to ask yourself a very important question. Why hasn’t a single health agency or major medical institution in the world been able to produce one single vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated study that shows that the vaccinated children are healthier? Wasn’t that the entire purpose of the vaccine program to make our children healthier? And although this may be an inconvenient study for anyone who said that the vaccine program was safe, there is a bright side. In every one of these studies so far, there is a group of children who are thriving, who aren’t suffering from many of the ailments that plague America’s children, who have barely any cases of neuro-developmental disorders or autoimmune disease. They are living in a world that is flourishing with health because their parents went in a different direction. You now have even more data. You’ve been informed. What are you going to do about it? That choice is yours.