MORE ON VAX NANOTECH

Test Blood for Nanotech + Thomas Baine Chemistry

Nanoparticle vaccine for COVID-19 spurs robust immune response in preclinical tests https://www.scripps.edu/news-and-events/press-room/2020/20200921-zhu-covid19.html

CHEAP TEST FOR NANOTECH

B.E.'s comment from https://covidandvaxfaqs.substack.com/p/dr-ana-mihalcea-nanotech-video/comment/40226604. Simple thing, take 2 drops of your own blood and go and do an LBA (Live Blood Analysis). You will see nanotechnology in your blood if you got vaxxed. Also, there is another test you can do for synthetic biology that Dr. Ana invented. I have tried this to{o}, and it is a cheap test for synthetic biology (without using a microscope). It's here... I worked in the hospital for 23 years (if you can find a nurse to draw your blood, wait 4 hours {after drawing the blood, I presume}, then pull the blood clots apart with rubber gloves). Warning: graphic (bloody) photos anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/rubbery-clot-formation-shown-in-living.

Blood does clot if you’re healthy, but rubbery clots might indicate hydrogel. I don’t know that it would indicate nanotech. That needs to be investigated. Sam asked Ana on his show my question about where to find practitioners who can do live blood analysis to find nanotech. She said they generally don't know how to spot nanotech, or something like that. But I found that there is a directory of practitioners at https://livebloodonline.com/directory-of-practitioners/. However, it’s questionable that nanotech would be visible in live blood analysis, as I discuss below.

REMOVE NANOTECH

This video shows how to make a triangular magnet-covered device to remove nanotech from the body: https://www.bitchute.com/video/BiuF32QmiO1G/. The author seems to say that it works for Morgellon’s too.

PROOF OF NANOTECH IN VAXES

B.E.: Here is the government link that proves nanotechnology is in the vaccines, signed off by at least 32 USA agencies, and the USA President: anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/national-nanotechnology-initiative. You can read the original 85 pages document yourself here, or from the white house website. (There are hundreds more, but this one is clear) https://www.nano.gov/publications-resources

https://www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/pub_resource/NNI-FY23-Budget-Supplement.pdf

LIVE BLOOD ANALYSIS MAY NOT DETECT NANOTECH

Bing A.I. answered my question: What microscopic magnification is needed to view nanotechnology?

To view objects at the nanoscale, very special instruments are needed(1). A modern light microscope can provide magnifications of over 2000 times, which is enough to see inside plant and animal cells, but not in much detail(2). Many nanoscale objects are so small that light aimed at them misses, and so is not reflected back for us to see(2).
For a high magnification optical microscope, we can see and resolve structures down to about 250 nm(3). However, to see things at the nanoscale, instruments like electron microscopes, atomic force microscopes, and scanning tunneling microscopes are used(1). For instance, a scanning electron microscope can image areas ranging from approximately 1 cm to 5 microns in width (magnification ranging from 20X to approximately 30,000X, spatial resolution of 50 to 100 nm)(4).
So, the exact magnification needed to view nanotechnology can vary greatly depending on the specific nanostructures being observed and the type of microscope being used.
1. https://nano.montana.edu/seeing-nanoscale.html
2. https://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/resources/1652-seeing-atoms
3. https://nnci.net/seeing-nanoworld
4. https://serc.carleton.edu/research_education/geochemsheets/techniques/SEM.html
5. https://www.nano.gov/nanotech-101/what/seeing-nano
6. https://www.nnci.net/seeing-nanoworld

Then it answered this question: What's the magnification range in live blood analysis?

In live blood analysis, the magnification range can vary. Typically, when using a 40X objective, the magnification is 400X through the eyepieces and 1600X on the screen(1). Some systems even offer an on-screen magnification of up to 4000X(2). This higher on-screen magnification allows for a more detailed analysis of the blood cells(1).
1. https://www.neogenesissystems.com/products/live-blood-analysis-equipment/
2. https://www.neogenesissystems.com/product/complete-turnkey-live-blood-analysis-package/
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_blood_analysis
4. https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/39328/what-magnification-do-i-need-to-see-blood-cells

RELATED INFO

WHAT THE HELL IS IN THE DENTAL SHOTS?

It is NOT fucking sand !! It is chemtrail nanotech.

AMAZING Connection Between Graphene Oxide, NANOTECH, Mac Codes, 5G and More!

Dr. James Giordano on Neuroweapons

B.E. added: PEER REVIEWED RESEARCH shows they have designed a kill switch that can kill Billions in seconds, without even being near a 5G Tower. {See}: REMOTE KILL SWITCH INSIDE ALL HUMANS (with the COVID-19 "vaccines"): https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-09-14-remote-kill-science-paper-reveals-cell-phone-signals-release-biological-payloads-graphene-oxide.html.

Mike Adams may be an alarmist, so I'm skeptical until I see evidence. I haven't read that link yet.

THERAPY BIOCHEMISTRY

I think Thomas Baine, who questioned Ana in a recent Weaponized News video, said he's a biochemist. He does seem knowledgeable about biochemistry (and conspiracies), but I don't know how knowledgeable yet. He said in a comment on a recent post of mine that all solids are crystals. I had chemistry and biology in highschool and another biology course in college and I've studied science quite a bit for the past couple decades especially. I didn't think all solids are considered to be crystals, so here's Bing A.I.'s answer to my question: Is an iron nail a crystal?

An iron nail is not a crystal. Crystals are solid materials whose atoms are arranged in a highly ordered, repeating pattern extending in all three spatial dimensions. Iron nails, on the other hand, are made of steel, which is iron with a small amount of carbon included to increase hardness. The arrangement of atoms in an iron nail does not have the ordered, repeating pattern that defines a crystal.

So Thomas seems to have a different view, or is somewhat misinformed.

Thomas claimed that quercetin and methylene blue contain cancer-causing benzene, which appears to be true. But he also claimed that graphene is benzene. Here's Bing A.I.'s answer to my question: What's the difference between graphene and benzene?

Benzene and graphene are both forms of carbon, but they have different structures and properties. Benzene is an aromatic hydrocarbon with the formula C6H6. Its structure consists of a ring of six carbon atoms, with alternating single and double bonds1. This gives benzene additional stability not seen in acyclic 1,3,5-hexatriene. On the other hand, graphene is an allotrope of carbon consisting of a single layer of atoms arranged in a hexagonal lattice. Each atom in a graphene sheet is connected to its three nearest neighbors by σ-bonds and a delocalised π-bond, which contributes to a valence band that extends over the whole sheet. Graphene conducts heat and electricity very efficiently along its plane. In summary, while both benzene and graphene are forms of carbon, benzene is a molecule with a specific number of atoms, whereas graphene is a two-dimensional material that can be arbitrarily large.

So he seems to be wrong on that too, or has a different view. I read somewhere else some months ago that graphene is actually graphite, which I think is probably true. Bing A.I. tries to deny it, but then admits it at the end of the following answer to my question: What's the difference between graphene and graphite?

Graphene and graphite are both forms of carbon, but they have distinct differences in terms of structure and properties. Graphene is a single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal lattice. Each atom in a graphene sheet is connected to its three nearest neighbors by σ-bonds, and there is a delocalised π-bond over the whole sheet1. This arrangement results in a perfectly flat, two-dimensional, just one-atom-thick structure. Graphene is incredibly strong and has an ultimate tensile strength of over 130 GigaPascals (GPa), making it one of the strongest materials known. It is an excellent conductor of both heat and electricity. On the other hand, graphite is a mineral composed of multiple layers of graphene stacked on top of each other. Each carbon atom in graphite is bonded covalently to three neighboring carbon atoms, forming layers of interconnected hexagons. These layers are held together by weak van der Waals forces, allowing them to slide past one another with ease. This sliding ability gives graphite its characteristic lubricating properties. In summary, while both graphene and graphite are forms of carbon, graphene is a single layer with exceptional strength and conductivity, whereas graphite consists of multiple layers of graphene with weaker interlayer forces, making it useful as a lubricant and heat-resistant material.

Thomas said EDTA is toxic, which I'm sure is true, because the mainstream admits that taking it for more than 5 to 7 days straight or taking a dose higher than 3 grams tends to be fatal. Thomas showed a chemical diagram of EDTA, which has 4 acetic acid molecules connected to an N-C-C-N core (that's nitrogen-carbon-carbon-nitrogen). The acetic acid is the main ingredient in vinegar, which is healthful and is apparently what allows EDTA to remove nanotech, though I'm not ceratin about that. Thomas said the core is toxic, but he said it's not cyanide. I thought it was 2 cyanide molecules joined together. But he didn't say what that core is, so I don't know why it's toxic if it's not 2 cyanides. Here's Bing A.I.'s answer to my question: What molecule contains N-C-C-N?

The molecule that contains an N-C-C-N structure is cyanogen. Cyanogen molecules consist of two CN groups bonded together at their carbon atoms, forming a structure like this: N≡C‒C≡N. It’s important to note that other isomers have been detected.

Here's its answer to my next question: What molecule is C-N?

The molecule that contains a C-N structure is cyanide. Cyanide is a pseudohalide anion and consists of a carbon and a nitrogen atom having a triple bond. It carries a charge of -1 and is a conjugate base of hydrogen cyanide (HCN).

Thomas indicated in comments that he considers it important to get to the bottom of the nanotech in vaxes etc issue. I do too.