HUMAN GENOME PROJECT FAKERY

Part of the Covid Scam? Couey Video Partial Transcript

My sampling below from J.J. Couey's latest video at https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2063608107 isn't extremely informative, IMO, regarding the Human Genome Project, but I thought since I went to the trouble to have these parts of it transcribed, I may as well share it here, because there's some good info in it. I'm sorry it's not as good as it could be. I have a good transcribing tool, but his videos are so long that even with that it's a laborious process to edit it properly. I'll probably stick with short videos henceforth. I prefer videos that say a lot in a short time, instead of in a long time. Couey talked lately about pulling the trigger on some kind of important info, to get it out to the public when the time is right, soon. So I've been hoping to see if he has pulled the trigger yet, but no luck so far. The point of the video is likely to connect it with the Covid scam. There may be a lot of good info that my excerpts have missed, but I don't have time to do a thorough search in such long videos. He outs conspirators sometimes.

THE HUMAN GENOMIC REVOLUTION

It's the 15th of February 2024. We have been consciously manipulated. Our habits have been organized. Our opinions have been manipulated over the course of decades, since we were kids. And once you start to understand that, then you can start to see how we were fooled when we were children, when there was only three newspapers and 2 or 3 TV channels. And what's happening to our children now, when they already have a cell phone, and they already might have TikTok, if you haven't been very vigilant? We are still fighting this unseen mechanism of society, but we're starting to, I think, acknowledge that it might be more in our face than we {thought}. And that actually, this is how informed consent has been ignored for the duration of the pandemic. And it is these people, in cooperation with the national security operation and in cooperation, likely, with weaponized piles of money, and cooperation with likely pharmaceutical companies and other manufacturers ..., contractors that were involved in this. {They} have all been involved in making sure that none of us can exercise informed consent. And everybody accepted "the worst case scenario" and ... we all tried our best to comply. And that was all part of the plan. That's what I'm trying to argue. That's what I'm trying to explain. They fooled us into solving a {false} mystery by first keeping us at home and making us feel lost on a road all by ourselves, and then getting picked up by this team "Worst case scenario", {who} told us crazy stories for a year about how they were going to break all the rules to make sure that we didn't die {from Covid} and that the worst case scenario was avoided. But if the worst case scenario came and people ... didn't conform to the public health authority in the way that they needed to, if people didn't take the necessary precautions, we could have a disaster. And there were people behind the scenes, yeah, in social media, mainstream media, whose job was to do this, to make sure that the worst case scenario was not considered to be a few thousand people, a little worse than SARS-1. No, {they needed us to believe} the worst case scenario could be billions. And this worst case scenario was used to motivate us #1 to conform to the lockdowns, and conform to the school closures, and conform to the masking in public. But it also tricked us into believing that there was a mystery to solve, that there was a crime being covered up, that there were lies being told.

... And that was in 2020. And in 2021, ... we could have had people on the internet and on social media elevated spontaneously, because they had the right message, which was that natural immunity was better than anything that the government would provide in the form of a vaccine, that natural immunity to previous encounters with RNA's like this might be relevant. And the shocking thing was/is that there were people on all sides of that narrative pulling us away from that foundational truth. That was that we could trust our bodies and our natural immunity and our previous health condition, likely better than we could risk it on a novel countermeasure {like RNA vaxes}. And so I never got to this idea until 2023, because again, I was also swimming in this, in this muddy water, filled with people who had all kinds of crazy stories and conjectures about what this had to be, and why it had to be that. And it is not random, that people like Kevin McKernan and Charles Rixey, George Webb and Paul Cottrell, and I mean, the list is just endless of people who were there at the beginning of the pandemic, seeding this "worst case scenario" narrative, instead of amplifying the idea that, holy cow, maybe wait a minute, wait a minute. Maybe we should not trust the public health system that's given us this vaccine schedule, that lots of people have known has been sketchy for years, that everybody's been ignoring. Maybe we should slow down and hold the phone for a minute. Oh, nobody with that voice was elevated, until the end of the year in 2020 in Germany, where Robert F Kennedy Junior spoke. And did he speak about public health and about lockdowns and about how the.... Yes, he did. He spoke against all of it. Was he elevated? No. He was lambasted by his own wife. And what did they distort it into? That he compared it to something to do with the Nazi regime, and something to do with World War 2. And that was just unacceptable. It is unacceptable to make that parallel, even though now we have someone as ... courageous as Vera Sharav making that very comparison and doing it with ... success also. Nowhere on the internet, nowhere to be found. Five-part movie, nowhere to be found, nowhere to be heard. Not on mainstream media, not on social media, just vanished, gone.

And so understand very clearly that this is the main message of Gigaohm Biological. Anything else that somebody says that we're off on is ignoring these basic messages, which is that intramuscular injection of any combination of substances with the intent of augmenting the immune system is dumb. Which is that transfection in healthy humans was criminally negligent, and there are thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of academic biologists and ... academic doctors, Med, MD's, that should have known, because they've used transfection in the past, that this technique, this methodology would have been wholly inappropriate for augmenting the immune response of any healthy human. They should have known it. They did know it. They just chose not to know it. And that's because they have grown up and developed as career adults inside of a system, which makes them look the other way, and stick right to their own little sliver of knowledge, whatever that might be, and not to step on the toes of any other academician that might have it wrong, "because that's not my expertise. That's theirs. I'll let their grant committee figure that out." And so I was the only person at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine that took the time to speak out against transfection. The only one of 135 members of the faculty of neurobiology that spoke out, one of hundreds of faculty members that did not. I'm the only one that did in that entire Med school, as far as I know, because no one's contacted me. No one said, "Hey man, I totally agree with you." Think about that.

And how many Med schools are there in the United States where people have the professional expertise to have known that transfection in healthy humans is criminally negligent, to have known and could know now that Peter Culliss's admission, that they can't control where the lipid nanoparticle goes, is a very big problem. They could have known. They could know. They could come out and say it and be heroes. Nobody's doing it, because it's ... not glorious enough to admit you had it wrong for three years, so nobody has the courage to do it. But I'll gladly admit. But I will also claim with much vigor, that when I was still consulting for Bobby {Kennedy, Jr.} on that book and CHD asked me to write a letter to the no-virus people, I wrote a letter which was inviting them to come to the table and talk about the molecular biological explanation I had, where they might be right and some other molecular biologist might think they're right. Because they don't understand coronavirus biology and molecular biology well enough to understand how they've been bamboozled by PCR and sequencing. But no, the no-virus people would have nothing of it, and ... went with nothing but insults and asked for only citations that had to do with isolation and purification, and "otherwise we don't wanna talk to you". And those same no-virus people are now starting to promote Denny Rancourt, as though he's realizing that virology is on thin ice, and continuing to call me a gatekeeper, even though I presented ... them with the opportunity to win.

... Who is objecting to it {the claim that the Covid virus is novel and pandemic material}; who has stepped forward repeatedly as a supposed dissident, supposedly people speaking out. And some of the most extraordinary people to speak out are people who are tied all the way back to HIV, the original virology illusion. And yet, somehow or another, after three years of waking up, some of these people still haven't even bothered to think about that possibility, haven't even bothered to entertain the possibility that the people who objected to the HIV PCR testing in the 80s were right. ... Today I wanted to watch a video, which is kind of a shout-out to my friend Mark Kulak who has been doing a lot of work researching the Human Genome Project and what led up to it. What people were involved? And what was really accomplished there. And he did a couple videos; on one video from a day or two ago about Eric Lander.

<1 hour 43 minutes>

In other words, China, the UK, Denmark, anywhere where they've had a centralized database, ... medical, the United States Bio-security state thinks that they are very much ahead of us, because we haven't been able to collect genetic data, because we have laws protecting this privacy. We have a whole system that's fragmented into different States and different private entities. And so it's been very much more difficult for us to get something like this going. They think that we are behind the rest of the world. And so part of the impetus that is pushing this forward, despite the the absurdity of COVID-19 and SARS COVID 2, the pandemic, is this impetus to catch up. And it's our freedom and our sovereignty and our individuality and our legislative laws and our system of a Republic in the United States that is preventing this, that's holding us back. And these globalists don't care anymore. They don't want this system. They never have wanted it. In fact, a lot of the people that are involved in this {virus?}-centered operation I think have always been interested in bringing America down for the last 200 years of her existence. We may have never really escaped the crown {UK}. There are many people that make that argument and the reason why I think we are here where we are right now, is because these higher powers, these weaponized piles of money, have decided that this is something that we need, this is the way forward, this is the future, and they decided it a long time ago. We are just starting to be able to see it much more clearly, because they exposed themselves with the pandemic.

... If you come to the Broad 15 talks, you will ... hear about CRISPR genome editing and how that allows you to edit genes, activate genes, inhibit genes, and suddenly you have all these tools. Read genomes, study the expression patterns of single cells, edit the genome, tweak the genome, and then finally data. Data science is critical doing this as has been done. And finally data. --- What he mentions here in this slide is the sequencing of single cells right here, single cell analysis of RNA and chromatin. Actually, it's quantitative PCR to assess the various subtypes of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors that were present in individual neurons that I pulled out of brain slices of mice? So I'm right there. I was part of this revolution. I know exactly, exactly what he's talking about. I know a lot about how these techniques are done.... This is unlike immunology. This I knew before the pandemic. I wouldn't call myself the expert, but I would call myself a very competent player with with single cell PCR technique. Whether or not you think they're very valuable, or give us a particular insight, is a completely different thing. But I know that I was involved in helping to develop this methodology at a time when not very many people were doing it, in the brain, and I've also done it in human slices.... I'm not an armchair molecular biologist. I have done these experiments myself, and I've published the work.

... Where is all this data being stored now for the Epic database, for example? Are we storing it on Amazon servers? If we're storing it on Amazon servers, then, technically speaking, is that data private? Or do certain people in that infrastructure of Amazon actually have access to it? I think that's probably right. And, if they are stored offshore or outside of the contiguous United States, are they are assets? Are they still? If they're stored on a server farm in the Netherlands, that's powered by solar.... I mean this is where our genetic data (and it's used against us) becomes very, very cryptic and dangerous, because again, once it's being stored, ... the Gray area that's created, once this data is being stored and shared and analyzed, the Gray area can't be underestimated.

<2 hours>

... {Lander speaking on video:} {It's a pretty remarkable thing, the human genome. Human cells turn out to be this incredible library of information. This is the beautiful library in the University College Dublin. And this is how I think about the genome and all these genomes. If you ask the right questions, you can learn so much. You can learn about disease and health. You can learn about evolution. You can learn about Physiology. You can learn about migration. It's all there. If we can pull out the right volumes and learn to read it in the right ways. ... For the first time, we really can find the causes of all these Mendelian diseases. We can find so many of these things affecting common diseases. I have no doubt anymore that this will become the Library of information for people who now go forward to create therapies. We see enough examples to know that this will become routine. It's not gonna be easy. ... It's gonna take a generation, but I feel enormous confidence in it.}

A generation. ... Why are they doing this? Because we are at a time point when human diversity is at its peak for all time and there will never be more genetic diversity available again. Your grandchildren are what they need in order to fill this database with the data that they will eventually use to crack the human genome, to get beyond where they were, to actually complete the task that they said they completed {but didn't yet}. Could that Nature cover back in the early 2? All a big smoke and mirrors program. Just like when Robert Malone said that when he was cutting his teeth back in Murray Gardner's lab, he thought that, {for} viruses to cure, human genome {knowledge could} cure human diseases. So he's talking about exactly the same thing Eric Landers {is} talking about gene therapy to cure these Mendelian inherited diseases. We're still not doing it. It's still not happening. Jesse Gelsinger is still the one guy, the one example. Ladies and gentlemen, this is an illusion. This is a mythology. They've been telling each other for 20 years and keep resetting the story. It's 10 years from now, just over the hill. The AI is gonna come and solve the problem. Just over the hill, the artificial general intelligence is gonna finally awaken and, as long as we do it right, and get it right the first time.... Ladies and gentlemen, stop all transfections in humans, because they are trying to eliminate control group by any means necessary. Intramuscular injection of any combination of substances with the intent of augmenting the immune system is dumb; transmission in healthy humans is criminally negligent.