CONTENTS — FIND IN PAGE
CANDACE OWENS EPSTEIN FILES
The Epstein Files: The Midas Touch | Ep 1 — Candace Owens
_This video, lasting 58 minutes, delves into the origins of Jeffrey Epstein, the connections across countries and powerful individuals, and offers commentary on Donald Trump’s public statements about the ongoing investigations. The content is structured with timeline segments and marked discussion points, as detailed below:
- High-Level Outline and Highlights:
_00:00-00:44: Candace Owens opens by referencing Trump’s recent comments calling some people “weaklings” and “stupid” for caring about the Epstein case. She poses the question: “Who is Trump protecting?” and emphasizes the importance of continuing the investigation given the scale of possible coverups.
_00:44-03:50: Owens points out the international scope of the Epstein case, mentioning countries like Ukraine, Iran, Lebanon, the U.S., France, Russia, and even Lichtenstein, which allegedly served as a conduit for Robert Maxwell’s money laundering. She also notes Wilkie Farr & Gallagher law firm’s historical and current associations, connecting them to contemporary celebrities. {Suspiciously, she omits mention of UK conspiracy, though she does mention Prince Andrew. I add more on both below.}
_03:50-30:02: Owens provides a detailed timeline of Jeffrey Epstein’s early life, from his 1953 birth in Brooklyn’s Seagate neighborhood (predominantly Orthodox Jewish of Russian origin), through his peculiar academic path featuring early graduation, brief stints at Cooper Union and NYU, and ultimately his early career:
- Hired at the prestigious Dalton School despite lacking college credentials, under headmaster Donald Barr (author of "Space Relations"), a former OSS member (predecessor to the CIA). {More on Space Relations below.}
- Epstein’s conduct at Dalton School, including allegations of inappropriate attention toward teenage girls.
- Epstein’s rapid entry into finance, notably at Bear Stearns, where he rose quickly without clear qualifications and resigned under a cloud of an SEC investigation.
- Repeated patterns: identity laundering, the “Midas touch” for rapid advancement, sexual deviance, elements of theater, and historical revisionism via press and name changes.
- Notable Quotes and Observations:
"We are, in fact, not stupid... when I hear [Trump] say that, it just inspires me more to look into this."
This reflects Owens’ stance that backlash and gaslighting make her more determined to pursue the Epstein investigation.
- On Epstein’s career leap:
"Somebody had their hand on them and they were pulled through the ranks."
_30:02-48:37: Discussion shifts more directly to Donald Trump, his administration, and possible motivations behind dismissing Epstein-related questions as “a hoax,” including direct audio from a Trump press appearance. Owens challenges the notion that concerns about the Epstein files are solely partisan or baseless.
"It's all been a big hoax. It's perpetrated by the Democrats and some stupid Republicans and foolish Republicans fall into the net..."
_48:37-end: Audience comments and broader reflections on systemic cover-ups, media complicity, and the need for continued public scrutiny.
BRITISH INVOLVEMENT
She didn't mention British Ambassador Lord Peter Mandelson's involvement with Jeffrey Epstein. Mandelson, recently appointed as the UK's ambassador to the US, has faced scrutiny and pointed questions due to past ties with Epstein. Here are the key points:
- Mandelson has acknowledged regretting his association with Epstein, whom he reportedly met through Ghislaine Maxwell. Mandelson has repeatedly stated that he wishes he had never met Epstein and regrets the harm caused to young women.
- Reports and internal documents — such as a 2019 JPMorgan memo filed in U.S. court — describe a "particularly close relationship" between Epstein, Prince Andrew, and Lord Mandelson, who was a senior member of the British government at the time.
- Mandelson and Epstein were seen together socially, including being photographed in St Barts in 2006 at a gathering organized by Maxwell.
- Newly released emails indicate that Mandelson remained in contact with Epstein until at least 2012, visiting Epstein’s Manhattan residence on at least two occasions after Epstein's conviction.
- When pressed about this relationship by reporters, Mandelson has responded curtly and refused to offer further details, sometimes with strong language, but consistently repeating his regret at the association.
- UK MPs have questioned the judgment of Mandelson's appointment as ambassador to the US specifically due to these past links, though government representatives maintain that he is qualified for the post.
- There is no public evidence from these reports of Mandelson being involved in criminal conduct. The controversy centers around his personal and social relationship with Epstein and whether this history raises questions about judgment or potential conflicts as a senior diplomat.
BRITISH ROYALTY
Candace Owens addresses Prince Andrew’s involvement in the Jeffrey Epstein case directly in her content. Here’s a summary of her main statements and emphasis based on available context:
- Photograph as Key Evidence: Owens highlights the now-famous photograph of Prince Andrew with Virginia Giuffre (then Roberts), describing it as "probably one of the most significant pieces of forensic evidence in any case in recent history." She credits Virginia with being "smart enough and cunning enough to play the good victim" by asking for a photo with the Prince, which her captors “foolishly agreed” to take on her camera. Owens argues this photo created “shock waves around the world” and forced the British royal family to confront the scandal, driving intense media attention and giving "tangible weight" to the scope of Epstein's operations.
- Implicating Setting and Behavior: Owens notes there is "no explanation for the prince to have his hand around a 17-year-old girl in that way in that setting with that person," reinforcing the damning implication of the image itself.
- Porn in Power: She uses Prince Andrew as an example to discuss "Porn in the halls of power," underscoring the theme of elite immunity and cover-up in the broader Epstein case.
- International Fallout and Royal Family: Owens emphasizes that this case "stopped the British royal family in its tracks," recognizing how Prince Andrew's involvement pushed the scandal into international focus and increased public scrutiny.
- Owens frames Prince Andrew's connection as central evidence of how powerful individuals became implicated through direct, tangible links to Epstein’s crimes.
THE REAL ISSUE: BRITISH PLOT
The video, "MANDELSON'S REVENGE: How Britain's New Ambassador Plans to DESTROY Trump's Economic Revolution," argues that Lord Peter Mandelson’s connection to Jeffrey Epstein is not just personal or social, but fundamentally tied to maintaining British global financial dominance—especially the influence of the City of London over the U.S. banking system. While public focus has often been on Epstein’s sex trafficking and blackmail, the video contends the real issue is a deeper financial agenda: Mandelson, as Britain’s new ambassador to the U.S. and former political heavyweight, worked alongside Epstein on high-level matters related to U.S. financial policy, as shown in JPMorgan memos regarding their cooperation on Federal Reserve and banking regulations.
- According to the video, Epstein was not merely a criminal operator but acted as a conduit for British imperial banking interests, helping to destabilize and transform the U.S. financial landscape after the end of Bretton Woods in the 1970s. Mandelson’s close ties and operational coordination with Epstein are framed as part of an ongoing British elite effort to maintain a central bank-driven grip on the U.S. economy, using money, influence, and blackmail to control key financial policies.
- The video warns that media coverage often distracts from these deeper motives, focusing on scandal rather than the struggle for economic sovereignty. It positions Donald Trump’s economic nationalism and policies—such as tariffs and efforts to revive American commercial banking—as a direct threat to this British-led financial order, and interprets Mandelson’s present appointment as ambassador as part of a strategy to preserve this system in the face of potential American “economic revolution.”
TRUMP & KUSHNER
Candace Owens criticizes both Jared Kushner {Trump's son-in-law} and Donald Trump with respect to their attitudes and actions concerning Gaza and the Israel-Palestine conflict, focusing on several key themes:
- Owens highlights Kushner’s widely criticized comment about the value of Gaza as "waterfront property." She frames this remark as emblematic of a callous, opportunistic mindset among elites—seeing Gaza primarily in terms of its real estate potential rather than its ongoing humanitarian crisis. Owens argues that such statements fuel perceptions of indifference to Palestinian suffering and further alienate those seeking justice or empathy for civilians in Gaza.
- She points out that Kushner, both as Trump’s senior adviser and son-in-law, has been a major influence on Trump’s policies and public messaging regarding Israel and Palestine. Owens questions whether Kushner’s strategic and political interests might be driving Trump to support positions that are viewed as dismissive of Palestinian loss and hardship.
- Critiquing Trump directly, Owens notes that he and his supporters often claim moral clarity on Israel while ignoring serious criticisms of Israeli actions in Gaza. She draws attention to Trump’s administration’s role in moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and supporting Israeli government actions, accepting Kushner’s framing of Palestinian protests and violence—another example, in her view, of privileging one side’s narrative and interests over a more just or balanced approach.
- Owens underlines the hypocrisy of U.S. leaders condemning the actions of other countries while refusing to acknowledge the severity of what Israel is doing in Gaza. She uses Kushner and Trump’s rhetoric to illustrate a broader pattern of “moral selectivity” and lack of accountability for allies.
- In her video discussions, she references reports and articles on the Israeli government’s knowledge of potential Hamas operations before attacks, raising questions about the official narratives that Trump and Kushner promote and defend.
OCCULT CONNECTION
Candace Owens frequently connects occultism to a small elite group that she alleges wields influence across major global institutions, religions, and governments. She discusses historical occult figures like Aleister Crowley and links them to organizations such as NASA, claiming the space program’s founders were inspired by ritual magic and Thelema cult beliefs. Owens contends that occult rituals and secret knowledge have been preserved and hidden within or around mainstream religions—including forms of Judaism (specifically Kabbalah), Christianity, and Islam—and that modern elites manipulate symbols, media, and power structures in line with ancient esoteric traditions.
- She has singled out the Star of David (hexagram on Israel’s flag) as especially significant in her occultism narrative. {The hexagram has sometimes been associated with occult practices, black magic, and summoning or controlling demonic forces, particularly in grimoires and ritual magic. Its use in these contexts has led some to view it as a symbol of dark spiritual power or malevolent supernatural activity.} Owens claims the Star of David did not originally derive from traditional Judaism, but instead came from pagan and occult sources, specifically identifying it as the “Star of Remphan”—a symbol she associates with a child-sacrificing pagan deity and demonic worship. She alleges that only in the last few centuries did European Jews adopt this hexagram as their symbol, later amplified by the Zionist movement, and that its true origins are tied to dark spiritual practices. Owens insists that her critique does not target authentic Jewish faith; rather, she accuses a hidden network of “Frankists”—elite individuals who have either Jewish roots or claim Jewish identity—of deploying occult symbols and practices to pursue global power.
Palestine had highest literacy rate in ME even above Israel before October 2022. Palestinians were educated despite murderous Apartheid Israel oppression. Educated people know history.