DR MIHALCEA VIDEO, EDTA TOXIC

Good News: No Nanotech; Bad News: EDTA Is Very Toxic

UPDATE: Revising title to reduce potential offensiveness.

NOTE: I was in a bit of a hurry when I posted this and didn’t edit it as much as I’d have liked. I’m not that certain that Ana’s main claims about nanotech in people are errors. I’ll try to investigate a little more if I have time.

Also, the image of organic vinegar bottles is not meant to suggest that vinegar is toxic. Just the opposite. EDTA contains 4 vinegar molecules and 2 cyanide, possibly. The vinegar is what is beneficial, while the cyanide or something is very toxic, as I show below.

PERCENTAGES OF PEOPLE WITH NANOTECH IN BLOOD

Dr. Ana Mihalcea was on Weaponized News yesterday at https://rokfin.com/stream/38860 for the first half of the show. She left hastily when Thomas Baine started questioning her claims about self-assembling nanotech from vaxes. Before that, Sam Chase asked her my questions, which Geoff Wexler submitted to him. I asked about what percentage of people, vaxed and unvaxed, have this nanotech in their blood. She didn’t answer specifically, but seemed to suggest that almost all those who were vaxed have it and almost everyone in contact with them is getting it via shedding. I asked if there’s anything besides EDTA that can remove the nanotech. She said there are a number of things, like fulvic acid and humic acid etc, but she seemed to favor EDTA, which Thomas later showed is highly toxic, which I’ll discuss more below. I asked if there is a directory of practitioners who do live blood analysis, but she said they’re generally not trained to find nanotech, which she again claimed is related to Morgellon’s. I asked about the percentage of people having nanotech in their blood, because she seemed to say before that almost everyone has it, but I haven’t heard about it from others. Apparently, no one has it, as Thomas later explained.

UPDATE: I just looked up EDTA side effects. The following is from https://www.rxlist.com/edta/supplements.htm. “It is UNSAFE to use more than 3 grams of EDTA per day, or to take it longer than 5 to 7 days. Too much can cause kidney damage, dangerously low calcium levels, and death.” Any amount is probably too much. Smaller amounts of the cyanide likely just cause smaller amounts of kidney damage etc and no amount of damage is good.

5G RADIATION VS. VIRUSES

When she left, Thomas answered Frances Leader’s questions about 5G being responsible for the Covid deaths. He agreed that all of those kinds of radiation, from 1G to 5G, plus wifi, microwave radiation, radio waves etc, are known to be harmful to humans and other creatures and I guess he meant that they likely accounted for at least a large percentage of false-flag “Covid” deaths. Before Ana left she claimed that no virus has ever been isolated, so she is likely a no-virus believer, which Frances Leader seems to be as well. I don’t mind that they have that view, if they do, but I’ve written about it a few times, and it’s pretty certain IMO that viruses are real, but they may well be exosomes, which are tiny organelles of our own bodies, as well as in other creatures. Exosomes from one species can likely be toxic to another species. See e.g. my free online substack book at zzzzzzz.substack.com/p/covid-virus-and-vax-faqs-and-as. But I digress.

FAKE GRAPHENE VAX PATENT

Geoff wanted Ana to comment on a patent for a process that uses graphene oxide as a carrier for a coronavirus vax. Since she left, Thomas commented instead. He said the graphene is really benzene which is one of the strongest causes of cancer. I had read a few months ago that graphene is really just graphite, but now Thomas says graphene oxide is oxydized benzene.

NO NANOTECH IN VAXES

Ana left when Thomas commented that quantum dots don’t exist etc. So later he showed this screenshot of a slide from a Rumble video that Ana was in.

Ana said the square thing is self-assembled nanotech and the light spots are quantum dot LEDs, I think. Thomas said the square thing is a crystal and crystals have long been known to be able to “self-assemble” or “grow” by being immersed or drenched in a liquid containing minerals. And the light spots are reflections of light, like the reflections seen in diamonds and other gems etc. If Ana and Dr. Nixon have been finding these crystals in people’s blood, even though it’s surely not nanotech, it seems that it must be toxic. Now that I think about it, Spencer Feldman said in one of his videos that various crystals tend to form in the body from toxins and they’re hard to get rid of, but he has an expensive earthing device that gets rid of them after a few months.

everydayhealth.com

ANA ADVISES DETOXING WITH EDTA; THOMAS SHOWS IT’S POISON

Here’s a slide Thomas shows.

He shows that EDTA consists of vinegar plus a nitrogen molecule. The vinegar is healthful, but the nitrogen molecule is very toxic. The popular supplement, Quercetin, is super toxic, due to benzene content. The same applies to Methylene Blue. So, if Thomas knows what he’s talking about, don’t take EDTA, Quercetin, or Methylene Blue. {I changed my mind. See second Update below.}

UPDATE: I should have added that the 2 nitrogen atoms in the middle of the EDTA appear to be connected to 2 carbon atoms between the 2 nitrogens, which I gather would become 2 molecules of CYANIDE, which are each chemically abbreviated as CN. Cyanide is very toxic. Thomas now says it’s not cyanide but something toxic, though he doesn’t say what it is yet. I’ll try to ask.

UPDATE 11/28/24: A reader in the Comments expressed doubt about Quercetin being toxic because of benzene rings, since many natural foods contain it. So I asked A.I. about that. It replied as follows.

Yes, some nutrients contain benzene rings in their chemical structure. Quercetin, a flavonoid found in many fruits and vegetables, is an example of a nutrient-like compound that contains benzene rings. Specifically, quercetin has three benzene rings in its structure. While quercetin is not considered a traditional nutrient like vitamins or minerals, it is a bioactive compound or phytonutrient that offers potential health benefits. It is widely distributed in plant-based foods and acts as a powerful antioxidant. Other examples of nutrients or nutrient-like compounds that contain benzene rings include: Vitamin E (tocopherols and tocotrienols); Phenylalanine (an essential amino acid); Tyrosine (a non-essential amino acid); Other flavonoids (e.g., kaempferol, catechins)

While benzene itself is highly toxic, nutrients containing benzene rings are fundamentally different and generally not toxic. The key distinction lies in the molecular structure and chemical properties:

Molecular structure: Nutrients with benzene rings have these rings as part of a larger, more complex molecule. The benzene ring is integrated into the structure and cannot easily separate.

Chemical stability: In nutrients, the benzene ring is typically stabilized by other molecular components, preventing it from behaving like free benzene.

Biological function: Many nutrients with benzene rings, such as certain amino acids and vitamins, play essential roles in the body. Their overall molecular structure determines their function, not just the presence of a benzene ring.

Metabolism: The body processes these nutrients differently from pure benzene. They are metabolized through specific pathways that do not release free benzene.