DR ANA MIHALCEA NANOTECH VIDEO

Discussion of Self-Assembling Nanotech from Vaxes Etc.

As I said in my previous post, I’m investigating Ana’s claim that people have nanotech in their bodies from vaxes. I still think it’s a bad idea to use EDTA for detox, because it seems to be a severely toxic med, as I explained last time. In my previous post I showed this image below that Thomas Baine showed in the Weaponized News video with Dr. Ana Mihalcea.

He apparently got it from a Bitchute video at https://www.bitchute.com/video/zVk2oVR5JUSd/. Actually, I think it was a Rumble video he got it from, but it seems to be the same video as this, which a reader gave me this link to.

For the first 3 minutes Dr. David Nixon showed these objects above and other material possibly growing and he says these are crystals, just as Thomas said, and David said they had discussed such crystals in a previous video. In this video they don’t mention specifically what is being viewed. They mention vials later. I don’t know if they’re “vaccine” vials, or what.

In the image above, the orange arrow I inserted points to the remnant of the squarish crystal from the previous image. David said this change occurred over night. He and Ana say that the objects in the image are shrinking and disappearing. I think he said the magnification is 200 times and the speed is 400 times normal. So small objects and material move around a little. They say the movements are coordinated, but they don’t explain that clearly here. David next showed material that he said was liquid that dried out.

David said this image above caught his interest, but he didn’t elaborate. He just went on to the next images.

I inserted the above image on the left into the image on the right. He said these 2 images are extremely unusual and unnatural, but still no elaboration.

The 2 images above on the right are blowups of the images on the left. They compare similar material on slides left overnight that were either shielded from EMF (electromagnetic frequency, frequency unspecified) or unshielded. The shielding bag is on the left. The squarish objects appear when there is no shielding.

He said regarding the above image that over time it became clear that the squarish object toward the left seemed to be somehow collected from the crystal toward the right, pointing to the bright X-shaped structure.

Regarding the image above, Ana said the ribbon structure may be graphene which they haven’t analyzed, but similar images appear in live blood analysis and in vials (unspecified).

The above image pair David said shows crystals connected by ribbon, the top image being on day 1 and the bottom image shows them transformed after 2 months. He said clearly there’s been an increase in complexity rather than degradation. I guess he meant the crystals filled in and smoothed.

Above are 2 slides that I juxtaposed. The blowup in center has structures connected by ribbon that appeared to be disassembled next morning in the right blowup. He said he didn’t know what triggered that, whether it was loss of wifi or what.

In this image above is shown the same slide first with squarish objects or crystals on the right then in the middle a day or two or three later where those objects are less numerous or rearranged or something, but with crystal lattice starting to form, and finally on the right the lattice filled in the entire area within about half an hour.

These are the last 4 slides combined into one. The one on the left is a cross-section taken from material shown in the previous 3 images. It has some structures visible. Next is a crystal I guess from that cross-section. I’m not sure if the 3rd image is the same crystal. The 4th one on the right is the same as the 3rd, but less magnified so as to see that no other structures remain around it.

MY COMMENT. It’s not clear to me what all this is, other than crystals apparently. If the magnification is only 200 times, it’s surely not enough to view nanotech. It appears that wifi or EMF has an effect on this material. If anyone knows what is being viewed, feel free to let me know in the comment section below.

ANA’S AUTOBIOGRAPHY

Ana has a post called: I AM STARTING A NEW FREEDOM MOVEMENT: Humanity United - For The Preservation Of The Human Species at anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/i-am-starting-a-new-freedom-movement. I only read part of it, but she talks about her spiritual beliefs a little. She follows a spirit guide named Ramtha, if I understood right. I believe Jesus is probably real, but all religious ideas originally came from our ancestors living under a different sky than we have now, where there were planets near to Earth and plasma phenomena which people thought were gods who caused cataclysms on Earth. I think Jesus knew that. I have a substack book in progress on that at zzzzzzz.substack.com/p/ancient-myths-are-planetary-history.

DNA CRYSTALS

This is pretty amazing. I had no idea that DNA can be crystalized. Maybe that’s what it is when it dehydrates.

3D DNA Crystals and Nanotechnology 2016 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1437431

Abstract. DNA's molecular recognition properties have made it one of the most widely used biomacromolecular construction materials. The programmed assembly of DNA oligonucleotides has been used to create complex 2D and 3D self-assembled architectures and to guide the assembly of other molecules. The origins of DNA nanotechnology are rooted in the goal of assembling DNA molecules into designed periodic arrays, i.e., crystals. Here, we highlight several DNA crystal structures, the progress made in designing DNA crystals, and look at the current prospects and future directions of DNA crystals in nanotechnology.

That was 7 years ago, so much more has likely been done by now.

NANOTECH AND SELF-ASSEMBLY

Most complex nanoparticle crystal ever made by design: Extraordinary nanoparticle crystals are possible by harnessing particle shape in addition to using DNA as smart glue. youtube.com/watch?v=9v8yE1t0myg

Nanocrystalization: An Emerging Technology to Enhance the Bioavailability of Poorly Soluble Drugs 2019 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6967137/

What If You Were Injected With Graphene? youtube.com/watch?v=kp6-bgvlRhg. The video pretends that graphene would be good for us, but it’s more likely poison, as Thomas said, actually turning to cancer-causing benzene.

Using DNA to drive the self assembly of materials youtube.com/watch?v=54BhHZiE7XQ

It's Not Magic: Watch How Smart Parts Self-Assemble youtube.com/watch?v=GIEhi_sAkU8. If large objects can self-assemble like this, it certainly seems plausible that nanotech could do similarly.

So I don’t dismiss what Ana and David say (except for EDTA). It’s just that the video discussed above does not seem at all definitive. Let me know if there is something with more definitive evidence for self-assembling nanotech already being reality in vaxes or anywhere.

PS, I just noticed that my reader also sent me the link to the Rumble video, which seems to be much longer at https://rumble.com/v1puxz8-irrefutable-proof-of-self-assembly-structures-in-c19-shots-structures-assem.html. So maybe that tells us better what exactly was being analyzed. Okay, I listened to the opening and it’s still not clear, but Ana implied that vax vials were the subject of the slides.

ERROR

PS, again, F.L. tells me it was offensive for me to title my last post Dr Mihalcea’s Toxic Errors? She said a lot of people found it offensive. That’s interesting, because I got way more views on that post than any other so far. Does that mean offensive titles draw more views? If so, probably only if they’re in good taste. Is this one of the differences between men and women? Men are okay with being described as being in error, but not women? Maybe the media are training people that way. It’s okay to criticize men, but not women, on tv etc. I actually thought it was important to include Dr. Mihalcea’s name in the title, because I thought her readers needed to be informed of her error in promoting EDTA, which is very toxic. If I had not included her name, many people would likely have overlooked it. Maybe this is an issue that Sociocracy could help resolve. PS, again, I’m now wondering if it was offensive for F.L. to tell me that my previous post title was offensive. Maybe it’s offensive for me to think about that.